+1

it would be furthermore interesting to hear from the authors how
OSPF behaves once a massive scale of flow-routes 
(lets say in the order of > 100K is injected into OSPF).

/hannes

On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:45:24PM +0000, Osborne, Eric wrote:
| I'm not sure this has much value.  The vast majority of dynamic PE-CE is done 
with BGP; the little bit that isn't BGP is, in my experience, RIP.  I don't 
think I've seen many (any?) OSPF PE-CE deployments.  
| 
| 
| 
| 
| eric
| 
| -----Original Message-----
| From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Youjianjie
| Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 10:11 PM
| To: [email protected]
| Subject: [OSPF] 转发: New Version Notification for 
draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
| 
| Hi all,
| 
| This document discusses the use cases that OSPF is used to distribute 
FlowSpec routes. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque Link 
State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format.
| Your comments are appreciated.
| 
| Best Regards,
| Jianjie
| 
| -----邮件原件-----
| 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
| 发送时间: 2014年9月28日 10:32
| 收件人: Youjianjie; Youjianjie; liuweihang; liuweihang
| 主题: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
| 
| 
| A new version of I-D, draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
| has been successfully submitted by Jianjie You and posted to the IETF 
repository.
| 
| Name:         draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions
| Revision:     01
| Title:                OSPF Extensions for Flow Specification
| Document date:        2014-09-27
| Group:                Individual Submission
| Pages:                11
| URL:            
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
| Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions/
| Htmlized:       
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
| Diff:           
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
| 
| Abstract:
|    This document discusses the use cases why OSPF (Open Shortest Path
|    First) distributing flow specification (FlowSpec) routes is
|    necessary.  This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque
|    Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format that can be used to
|    distribute FlowSpec routes.
| 
|    For the network only deploying IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) (e.g.
|    OSPF), it is expected to extend IGP to distribute FlowSpec routes.
|    One advantage is to mitigate the impacts of Denial-of-Service (DoS)
|    attacks.
| 
| 
|                                                                               
    
| 
| 
| Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
| 
| The IETF Secretariat
| 
| _______________________________________________
| OSPF mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
| _______________________________________________
| OSPF mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to