Haven't been there for all of the conversation, but experimental makes sense. Previous comments were addressed in the new draft. Support.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their > colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is > consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is > disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide > significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment > dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as > an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG > adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015. > > For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt > > Thanks, > Acee and Abhay > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > -- William McCall
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
