Hi Acee,
On 9/30/15, 3:30 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On 9/30/15, 12:57 AM, "Pushpasis Sarkar" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi Les, >> >>On 9/30/15, 9:45 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>[Les:] Which seems to me to be exactly the definition of link of last >>>resort i.e. in the absence of any other alternative use the link >>>undergoing maintenance. >>>?? >>[Pushpasis] What if the operator does not want any traffic on those links >>at all? Should not there be a way to ensure that as well? > >We have this mechanism - you don’t advertise the link… [Pushpasis] I will then ask, what if he/she still want that link to be advertised (because we want to it to be visible) but yet not use it if it still fails some policy? Thanks -Pushpasis > >Acee > > >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
