On 10/14/15, 4:50 PM, "Ben Campbell" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: No Objection > >When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >introductory paragraph, however.) > > >Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > >The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag/ > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >COMMENT: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >The shepherd write up says that there have been no IPR disclosures, but >there has in fact been a disclosure on an earlier version. Wast he >working group aware of this disclosure? Ok - must have missed previously disclosed IPR. Will poll again. Thanks, Acee > >3.2, paragraph 4: "Each tag MUST be treated as an independent identifier >that MAY be >used in policy to perform a policy action." > >Given the context of the previous MUST, the MAY seems more descriptive >than normative. > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
