Thanks Acee. You were right. Text added now and rev++ posted. Thanks,
— Carlos. > On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Carlos, Manav, > I remember now as well - this is the text I was referring to after the > discussion including Les. > Thanks, > Acee > > From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM > To: Manav Bhatia <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: Acee Lindem <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, "Les Ginsberg > (ginsberg)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, OSPF WG List > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator > > Thank you Manav! I remember now :-) > > Done :-) > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03 > <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03> > > Thanks, > > — Carlos. > >> On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Carlos, >> >> I think we need to add the following in the current version: >> >> “When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator >> is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document.” >> >> I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have one >> with you? >> >> Cheers, Manav >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hi, Acee, >> >>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM >>> To: Acee Lindem <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>, Manav Bhatia <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>, >>> "[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>" >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>, OSPF WG List >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator >>> >>> Hi, Acee, >>> >>> Following up on your note below regarding >>> draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send >>> this document to the IESG? >>> >>> Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been >>> modified since Sept 24, 2015. >>> >> >> Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done here: >> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt >> >> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt> >> >> I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something else? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Carlos. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>> >>> >>> [BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.] >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> — Carlos. >>> >>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. >>>> I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go >>>> forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Acee >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
