The text below is technically correct (other than the grammar). However, I’d view it more as additional information than an actual errata.
Thanks, Acee On 5/5/16, 8:17 PM, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]> wrote: >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6987, >"OSPF Stub Router Advertisement". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6987&eid=4685 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Technical >Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <[email protected]> > >Section: 4 > >Original Text >------------- > > >Corrected Text >-------------- >(At the end of the section) > >If the stub router is located in transit area, crossed by virtual >link(s), latter will become inoperational in case the stub router is >on path between two virtual link endpoints - either due to only path >in transit area or due to topology changes which move stub router onto >this path. > >Notes >----- >Virtual links become inoperational in case path metric between two >endpoints is > 0xffff. Path metric of two or more links, one of which has >MaxLinkMetric, will inevitably exceed value 0xffff. > >Instructions: >------------- >This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > >-------------------------------------- >RFC6987 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis-04) >-------------------------------------- >Title : OSPF Stub Router Advertisement >Publication Date : September 2013 >Author(s) : A. Retana, L. Nguyen, A. Zinin, R. White, D. >McPherson >Category : INFORMATIONAL >Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >Area : Routing >Stream : IETF >Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
