Peter, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alia, > > On 6/16/16 01:09 , Alia Atlas wrote: > >> Stefano, Clarence, and Peter, >> >> Could you please clarify if this IPR disclosure is simply updating the >> previously >> disclosed IPR or represents additional IPR? >> > > we updated the previous IPR with additional patent application. > Ok - this is after the confirmations on the list that there was no new IPR? That sounds like new IPR to me. While I realize that the company claiming IPR and the terms haven't changed, since the IPR has changed, I think this needs to go back to the WG for an additional WGLC. Regards, Alia > thanks, > Peter > > >> I do see that there is at least some overlap. >> >> Thanks, >> Alia >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:47 PM, IETF Secretariat <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Dear Peter Psenak, Stefano Previdi, Clarence Filsfils, Wim >> Henderickx, Jeff Tantsura, Hannes Gredler, Rob Shakir: >> >> >> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "OSPF >> Extensions for Segment Routing" >> (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions) was submitted to the IETF >> Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page of >> Intellectual Property >> Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2808/). The >> title of the >> IPR disclosure is "Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related >> to >> draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions" >> >> >> Thank you >> >> IETF Secretariat >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
