Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This was nice work. I did have one question - I don't think it would be a likely problem, but is it worth pointing out that you're taking OSPFv3 payloads that might have been sized for IPv6, and encapsulating them as IPv4 payloads that might have a smaller MTU? If you tell me this isn't a problem, I'll believe you, of course, but I needed to ask :-) _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
