I am not aware of any undisclosed relevant IPR. Regards, Keyur
On 6/26/17, 3:50 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Corrected draft alias - reply to this one. On 6/26/17, 6:45 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Authors, > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to >this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The >response needs to be sent to the OSPF mailing list. The document will >not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from >each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. > > >Thanks, >Acee > > > >On 6/14/17, 3:48 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" ><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >>The question of OSPFv2 complete blocking of transit routing support >>(similar to OSPFv3) seems to come up every year or so. I’d like to WG >>last >>call this document. Does anyone see any issues? >>Thanks, >>Acee >> >>On 6/14/17, 12:44 PM, "OSPF on behalf of [email protected]" >><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>directories. >>>This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the >>>IETF. >>> >>> Title : H-bit Support for OSPFv2 >>> Authors : Keyur Patel >>> Padma Pillay-Esnault >>> Manish Bhardwaj >>> Serpil Bayraktar >>> Filename : draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03.txt >>> Pages : 8 >>> Date : 2017-06-14 >>> >>>Abstract: >>> OSPFv3 defines an option field for router-LSAs known as a R-bit in >>> RFC5340. If the R-bit is clear, an OSPFv3 router can participate in >>> OSPF topology distribution without acting as a forwarder to forward >>> the transit traffic. In such cases, an OSPF router would only accept >>> traffic intended for local delivery. This draft defines R-bit >>> functionality for OSPFv2 defined in RFC2328. >>> >>> >>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/ >>> >>>There are also htmlized versions available at: >>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03 >>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03 >>> >>>A diff from the previous version is available at: >>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03 >>> >>> >>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>submission >>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>OSPF mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >>_______________________________________________ >>OSPF mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
