Thanks - the IPR was disclosed back before the draft was made a WG document. As expected, the claims are purely defensive. However, in the future, it would be better to have the formal statement earlier in the process. As a WG chair, I should have pushed for the formal statement even though I fully expected it to be in line with the other Huawei IPR statements. We’ll do better in the future ;^)
Thanks, Acee On 8/4/17, 6:00 PM, "OSPF on behalf of IETF Secretariat" <ospf-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of ietf-...@ietf.org> wrote: >Dear Huaimo Chen, Renwei Li, Alvaro Retana, Yi Yang, Vic Liu: > > >An IPR disclosure that pertains to your RFC entitled "OSPF >Topology-Transparent Zone" (RFC8099) was submitted to the IETF >Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual >Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3046/). The >title of the IPR disclosure is "Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement >about IPR related to RFC 8099" > > >Thank you > >IETF Secretariat > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
