Acee -

OSPF draft currently says:

"The G-Flag: Group Flag.  When set, the G-Flag indicates that
         the Adj-SID refers to a group of adjacencies (and therefore MAY
         be assigned to other adjacencies as well)."

IS-IS draft currently says:

"S-Flag.  Set flag.  When set, the S-Flag indicates that the
         Adj-SID refers to a set of adjacencies (and therefore MAY be
         assigned to other adjacencies as well)."

I do not see the terms "link-group" or "link-set" in either draft and I don’t 
see how they would apply to "adjacencies".
So exactly what is the issue and what is the proposed change?

If the concern is about the name "G-flag" vs "S-flag"  - I find this much ado 
about very little. (Sorry...)

    Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
> (acee)
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 11:46 AM
> To: Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[email protected]>
> Cc: OSPF WG List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions
> 
> Hi Dirk,
> 
> I agree we should use the same term but we have finished WG last call and
> AD review for the OSPFv2 Segment Routing extensions. Additionally,
> everyone is familiar with the term link-group. A link-set would be new
> terminology. Let’s fix the IS-IS draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> >
> >
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject:     draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions
> >Resent-Date:         Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:26:45 -0700
> >Resent-From:         <[email protected]>
> >Resent-To:   <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
> ><[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
> ><[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> >Date:        Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:26:47 +0200
> >From:        Dirk Goethals <[email protected]>
> >To:  <[email protected]>,
> ><[email protected]>,
> >"[email protected]"
> ><[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> >Hi authors,
> >
> >OSPF's G-flag and ISIS's S-flag are both representing adjacency sets,
> >see snip below, can we align these definitions and simply call it
> >S-Flag in both IGPs.
> >
> >Thx,
> >Dirk
> >
> >OSPFv2 and OSPFv3:
> >
> >           The G-Flag.  Group Flag.  When set, the G-Flag indicates that
> >           the Adj-SID refers to a set of adjacencies (and therefore MAY
> >           be assigned to other adjacencies as well).
> >
> >
> >
> >ISIS:
> >
> >           S-Flag.  Set flag.  When set, the S-Flag indicates that the
> >           Adj-SID refers to a set of adjacencies (and therefore MAY be
> >           assigned to other adjacencies as well).
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to