Hi Xiejing, (+OSPF List), On 10/20/17, 5:20 AM, "BIER on behalf of Xiejingrong" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>HI, all: > >About draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt, >In chap 2.1, BIER Sub-TLV is defined as a sub-tlv of the Extended Prefix >TLV (defined in RFC7684). >In chap 2.2, The BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER >Sub-TLV. >In chap 2.3, The BIER Tree Type Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV. >In chap 2.4, The BIER sub-domain BSL conversion Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of >the BIER Sub-TLV. >In chap 4, The document requests three new allocations from the OSPF >Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry as defined in [RFC7684]. > >Should the allocation for 3 Sub-TLVs of the BIER Sub-TLV be from some >registry, other than the OSPF Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry? No. With 64K Sub-TLV types, it is not likely that we will run out any time soon and some of the Sub-TLVs apply to multiple TLVs. Thanks, Acee >_______________________________________________ >BIER mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
