Dear all,
[I understand that I will reach both ISIS and OSPF folks with this mailer]
The ask for this group is to progress those documents:
* draft-ietf-ospf-yang: ietf-ospf (draft status: still ID-exists)
* draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg: ietf-isis (draft status: still ID-exists)
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/[email protected]
=> it passes validation and is NMDA compliant. Good.
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/[email protected]
=> it doesn't pass validation:
https://yangcatalog.org/results/ietf-isis@2017-07-25_ietf.html
=> it's not NMDA compliant (tree-type = split)
Regards, Benoit
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: NETMOD bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and
draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip publications
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:02:27 +0800
From: Benoit Claise <[email protected]>
To: NETMOD Working Group <[email protected]>, [email protected]
<[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
CC: Routing WG <[email protected]>, Alia Atlas <[email protected]>,
Benoit Claise <[email protected]>
Dear all,
Currently sitting in the rtgwg WG.
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip are currently in
AD review.
Let's look at the datatracker new YANG-related URLs to understand the
impact analysis (the dependent YANG modules) for these two drafts:
*
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[][email protected]&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both
*
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[][email protected]&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both
So the bottlenecks for standardization are:
* draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp:
o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip
* draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip:
o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip
o RFC8022bis: ietf-routing
o draft-ietf-ospf-yang: ietf-ospf (draft status: still ID-exists)
o draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg: ietf-isis (draft status: still
ID-exists)
So the ask to close on RFC7223bis, RFC7277bis, and RFC8022bis asap.
I understand the LC will start soon for these drafts.
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
