Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* It would be good to clarify that this document is intended for OSPFv2 only
(probably in the title and/or abstract). It may also be worthwhile for the
document and/or the Shepherd writeup to explain why the WG decided to separate
the OSPFv3 extensions into a different document.

* I think RFC2328 should be a Normative Reference and not an informative
reference.


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to