Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * It would be good to clarify that this document is intended for OSPFv2 only (probably in the title and/or abstract). It may also be worthwhile for the document and/or the Shepherd writeup to explain why the WG decided to separate the OSPFv3 extensions into a different document. * I think RFC2328 should be a Normative Reference and not an informative reference. _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf