> > To be able to use the route for further processing, it would be also nice, > if OSRM would return a list of original network link ID's instead of a more > or less simplified route geometry and a few via points. > > > Yes, we throw these IDs away. As a workaround you can adapt the LUA based > profile to use the way ID instead of the road name and take it from there. >
Does OSRM return all ID's then, since they will be different for every road segment? I mainly have road networks, where street have no names. Then the driving directions of OSRM are not so useful, and using ID's would be interesting. > > > This is not an issue for distance matrices, where you only need to total > distance or cost, but too much generalized routes was the reason, why I > couldn't make use of OSRM once. And especially if the OSRM routing result > could be later used again in PostgreSQL/PostGIS, having the original road > network ID's would be very helpful. > > > You can control the level of generalization with the zoom level parameter. > Is there a zoom level that does not generalize at all? Daniel > > > So far I couldn't find anything else than this JSON output format: > https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project-OSRM/wiki/Output-json > > > Yep, it is not in there. > > —Dennis > > > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > > -- Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan eMail: daniel.ka...@georepublic.de Web: http://georepublic.de
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
