I have many problems on installing nominatim can anyone help me to install nominatim on Linux server
i can give him server IP and username,password thanks On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:44 AM André Siefken <sief...@geozelot.com> wrote: > Thx Frédéric for the immediate reply, and sorry for me to take my time > to respond. > > I will rewrite the profiles to test general soft restrictions, however > my idea here is to have a profile that e.g. strictly uses distance > between possible matched waypoints to get the overall match. > > How would the matching behave if I'd remove all road type based > restrictions (e.g. vehicle type allowed or not, speed limit, oneways)? > > I do see where the algorithm needs certain base variables from the > network to estimate a likely route, though, and do have problems seeing > if this is feasonable at all, and I do ask instead of trying because it > will take me some time to get familiar with profile changes... > > André > > On 7/9/19 10:14 PM, Frédéric Rodrigo wrote: > > Le 09/07/2019 à 22:03, André Siefken a écrit : > >> Hi @all, > >> > >> I'm exploring ways to have the matching algorithm work agnostic to > >> (most) road restrictions and rather 'trust' the trace I pass in. > >> > >> I receive continuous GPS locations, with moderate to high resolution in > >> time, from bikes as well as cabs or buses. It just so happens that some > >> idiots ride their bikes on roads that OSM (and most laws) thinks they > >> shouldn't, as well as some cars ignoring bus lane restrictions or buses > >> leave their lanes. In those cases, matching fails one way or another > >> ([No match], or only partial matches). > >> > >> I have a hard time wrapping my head around if a profile can actually > >> fullfill restriction and/or even vehicle type (I can easily work with > >> multiple graphs, though) agnostic matching, which likely implies a > >> similar agnostic weighting. I imagine a shortest connection/path > >> matching should do just that, but then I'm at a loss if that is actually > >> the case and if so, how to generate such a profile. > >> > >> Your insights would be much appreciated... > >> > >> André > > > > > > I think the weighting is the right think to do. Use high weight on way > > there is no legal access. It's some kind of soft access restriction. > > You can even weight the opposite of a one way restriction. > > > > But you will have to rework all the samples profiles provided in OSRM. > > > > > > Frédéric. > > > > > -- > > pgp-key attached > > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk >
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk