Hi, On 2/27/20 20:45, Rohit Sivakumar wrote: > Is there any benefit to configuring osrm using shared memory when I'm > only running one osrm process per server ?
The benefit of holding the routing graph in shared memory is that you can (provided you have enough memory) spin up a new shared memory segment to hold a new, updated routing graph, and then switch from old to new in an instant, whereas not using shared memory means you have to terminate routed, move the files around, and start it up again which can mean a service interruption of a few minutes. Other than that I am not aware of any benefits (even if you *were* running several routing engines on the same server using the same routing graph, which also is not something that makes sense to me). Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk