On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 01:40:16PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 4/29/26 13:22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:18:08PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >> On 4/28/26 09:58, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> >>> I'm sorely tempted, both due to the increased volume and the risk of
> >>> premature disclosure, to just assume that any vulnerability reported as
> >>> a result of research using an LLM is trivially discoverable by others,
> >>> and give up trying to pretend there's any point to working it under
> >>> embargo.
> >>
> >> You are correct here:  you should assume that any LLM will give a similar
> >> result to another person who asks a similar question.  In other words,
> >> LLM-discovered vulnerabilities should be considered already publicly known.
> > 
> > I'm increasingly doing that myself already, and predicted the death of
> > embargoes a serveral months ago. Now I just remove unneeded details from
> > commit messages, merging and issue releases to keep users protected.
> > 
> > Embargoes now play against security, for all the time we don't act,
> > users stay exposed to anyone having the luck to find the same problem.
> > It's not a matter of the LLM's strength but a matter of determination
> > by the researcher who could simply run a small model several times
> > helping it dig further. Bigger models just find faster, but that only
> > counts for those seeking protection, not for those trying to attack.
> 
> I wonder if some projects will abandon releases altogether and switch
> to a "use the latest commit from the dev branch" model.

It brings more problems than solutions. Stable branches are a comfort
both for users and for developers because it allows to make progress and
take risks in a dev branch. When you only have a dev branch, you need to
be super cautious and often it prevents you from making breaking changes
that are nonetheless necessary.

But there will always be a number of projects working like this, I just
think that the changes in the bug reporting process will not change their
choice.

Willy

Reply via email to