On 7/31/26 17:39, David A. Wheeler wrote:
To be fair: Michael Catanzaro is saying he's simply abiding by the request of those projects. They don't want to receive any AI-generated content, and since most vulnerability reports have AI-generated content, Michael won't send them any.
Abiding by their request would mean to forward any report where it's not clear whether AI was involved or not (or doesn't look like it) and to leave the final decision to them. The post is saying… "it’s nice to not have to guess whether the issue report is AI-generated or not" …so it's a conscious choice and not just abiding to what projects asked for, the way I read it.
