We would really need the more granular OS ability. Agent names wouldn't work for us because of the number of agents involved. For example, there might be hundreds of SuSE 10.3 hosts, 11.1 hosts, RHE 4 hosts, RHE 5 hosts and so on. However, I think the role classification would be useful too.
TM On Jul 3, 10:22 am, cnk <lists.canuck...@gmail.com> wrote: > You could just do it by agent name: > > <agent_config name=”agent1|agent2|agent3″> > > I know there's also been some talk about agent groups. Something like this: > > <agent_group webservers> > <agents>agent1|agent6|agent10</agents> > </agent_group> > > <agent_group dnsservers> > <agents>agent3|agent4|agent11</agents> > </agent_group> > > I know I would rather see role classification then more granular OS > classification. > > -cnk > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:33 PM, tm<trevor.a.b.mcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is it possible to specify different values for the "os" shown below? > > We have different varients of Linux that require different agent > > configuration files. If we are restricted to just "Linux" it won't do > > us any good. > > > <agent_config os=”Linux|OpenBSD”> > > <localfile> > > <location>/var/log/my.log2</location> > > <logtype>syslog</logtype> > > </localfile> > > </agent_config> > > > Cheers! > > TM- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
