Same problem I am running into... there seems to be a limit on the length of 
the email alert.

-----Original Message-----
From: ossec-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:ossec-l...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Tim Eberhard
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 9:22 AM
To: ossec-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ossec-list] Problem adding custom rules using full commands

So on a side note. Now that the output works.. how do I get it to show
the previous output? Here is the alert I get when I turn off/on snmpd

OSSEC HIDS Notification.
2010 Nov 08 09:20:14

Received From: ossec->/sbin/chkconfig  --list | grep '3\on'
Rule: 510005 fired (level 7) -> "The system start up services have changed"
Portion of the log(s):

ossec: output: '/sbin/chkconfig  --list | grep '3\on'':
acpid              0:off    1:off    2:off    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
atd                0:off    1:off    2:off    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
auditd             0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
autofs             0:off    1:off    2:off    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
cfenvd             0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
cfexecd            0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
cpuspeed           0:off    1:on    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
crond              0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
iptables           0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
irqbalance         0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
lm_sensors         0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
lvm2-monitor       0:off    1:on    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
mcstrans           0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
mdmonitor          0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
messagebus         0:off    1:off    2:off    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
microcode_ctl      0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
mysqld             0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
netfs              0:off    1:off    2:off    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off
network            0:off    1:off    2:on    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off



--END OF NOTIFICATION



On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's alright Dan, you're helping me. I just greatly appreciate your
> assistance. I am in no rush as I am still using ossec in the lab
> trying to get all of these issues ironed out before we go to deploy
> it.
>
> Thanks again for your help,
> -Tim Eberhard
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM, dan (ddp) <ddp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just wanted to apologize for not getting to this yet. I haven't
>> forgotten about you, just had a "string of mondays." It's at the top
>> of my list though, so tonight or tomorrow.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sure thing.
>>>
>>> Attached is the ossec.conf & local_rules.xml. I've scrubbed it a bit :)
>>>
>>> Thanks again for all your help
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:48 PM, dan (ddp) <ddp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'll have to play with this tomorrow when I have access to my OSSEC setup.
>>>>
>>>> Could you perhaps post your ossec.conf and associated rules? REMEMBER
>>>> to remove passwords and IPs for anything you don't want to be public
>>>> knowledge. ;)
>>>>
>>>> I'll be able to plug your rules and configs into my setup to see if it
>>>> works for me.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Good point. I removed them all in an attempt to focus on one. I've
>>>>> readded it but I still don't see any change.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I let OSSEC syscheck run, then changed /bin/mount's permissions to
>>>>> be SUID. I see it show up in archives.log during the second check. But
>>>>> it never fires off an alert.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 11:57:43 ossec->find / -user root -perm -4000 -print
>>>>> ossec: output: 'find / -user root -perm -4000 -print':
>>>>> /usr/sbin/suexec
>>>>> /usr/libexec/openssh/ssh-keysign
>>>>> /usr/bin/at
>>>>> /usr/bin/gpasswd
>>>>> /usr/bin/passwd
>>>>> /usr/bin/sudoedit
>>>>> /usr/bin/sudo
>>>>> /usr/bin/chsh
>>>>> /usr/bin/chage
>>>>> /usr/bin/crontab
>>>>> /usr/bin/newgrp
>>>>> /usr/lib/vmware-tools/sbin64/vmware-hgfsmounter
>>>>> /bin/ping
>>>>> /bin/su
>>>>> /lib/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
>>>>> /sbin/pam_timestamp_check
>>>>> /sbin/unix_chkpwd
>>>>> /lib64/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 11:58:05 hostname->/var/log/messages Nov  3 11:58:05
>>>>> hostname  ntpd[2372]: sendto(XX.XX.XX.XX) (fd=20): Invalid argument
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 12:03:45 ossec->netstat -tan |grep LISTEN | grep -v
>>>>> '127.0.0.1' ossec: output: 'netstat -tan |grep LISTEN | grep -v
>>>>> '127.0.0.1'':
>>>>> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:3306                0.0.0.0:*
>>>>>     LISTEN
>>>>> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:111                 0.0.0.0:*
>>>>>     LISTEN
>>>>> tcp        0      0 :::80                       :::*
>>>>>     LISTEN
>>>>> tcp        0      0 :::22                       :::*
>>>>>     LISTEN
>>>>> tcp        0      0 :::443                      :::*
>>>>>     LISTEN
>>>>> tcp        0      0 :::8443                     :::*
>>>>>     LISTEN
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 12:03:45 ossec->awk -F\ '($3 == "0") {print}' /etc/passwd
>>>>> ossec: output: 'awk -F\ '($3 == "0") {print}' /etc/passwd':
>>>>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
>>>>> bobtest2:x:0:0::/home/bobtest2:/bin/bash
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 12:03:46 ossec->rpm -qa ossec: output: 'rpm -qa':
>>>>> libSM-1.0.1-3.1
>>>>> <SNIP, removed RPM output>
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 12:03:46 ossec->find / -user root -perm -4000 -print
>>>>> ossec: output: 'find / -user root -perm -4000 -print':
>>>>> /usr/sbin/suexec
>>>>> /usr/libexec/openssh/ssh-keysign
>>>>> /usr/bin/at
>>>>> /usr/bin/gpasswd
>>>>> /usr/bin/passwd
>>>>> /usr/bin/sudoedit
>>>>> /usr/bin/sudo
>>>>> /usr/bin/chsh
>>>>> /usr/bin/chage
>>>>> /usr/bin/crontab
>>>>> /usr/bin/newgrp
>>>>> /usr/lib/vmware-tools/sbin64/vmware-hgfsmounter
>>>>> /bin/ping
>>>>> /bin/su
>>>>> /bin/mount
>>>>> /lib/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
>>>>> /sbin/pam_timestamp_check
>>>>> /sbin/unix_chkpwd
>>>>> /lib64/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
>>>>> 2010 Nov 03 12:04:38  hostname ->/var/log/messages Nov  3 12:04:37
>>>>> hostname ntpd[2372]: sendto(XX.XX.XX.XX) (fd=20): Invalid argument
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:07 PM, dan (ddp) <ddp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> So changing it to logall and then changing a start up item via
>>>>>>> chkconfig..I don't see anything. Nothing in my alerts about it being
>>>>>>> changed either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see the chkconfig check being run in your logs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Make sure the command runs, then change it, and make sure it runs again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My log file is below. Does the syscheckd error matter in this case?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd see what kind of file that is, but it shouldn't matter in this
>>>>>> instance. I get the same error for a "broken" symlink.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> r...@ossec:/var/ossec/logs# tail -f ossec.log
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector(1950): INFO: Analyzing file:
>>>>>>> '/var/log/nmap-out-bird.log'.
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>> of command(360): netstat -tan |grep LISTEN | grep -v '127.0.0.1'
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>> of command(360): awk -F: '($3 == "0") {print}' /etc/passwd
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>> of command(360): rpm -qa
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>> of command(360): awk -F: '($2 == "") {print}' /etc/shadow
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>> of command(360): find / -user root -perm -4000 -print
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Started (pid: 23635).
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-analysisd(1210): ERROR: Queue
>>>>>>> '/queue/alerts/ar' not accessible: 'Connection refused'.
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-analysisd(1301): ERROR: Unable to connect to
>>>>>>> active response queue.
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:56:56 ossec-analysisd: INFO: Connected to
>>>>>>> '/queue/alerts/execq' (exec queue)
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:57:57 ossec-syscheckd: INFO: Starting syscheck scan
>>>>>>> (forwarding database).
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:57:57 ossec-syscheckd: INFO: Starting syscheck database
>>>>>>> (pre-scan).
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:57:57 ossec-syscheckd: INFO: Initializing real time file
>>>>>>> monitoring (not started).
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:59:34 ossec-syscheckd: ERROR: Invalid internal state
>>>>>>> (missing '/etc/alternatives/jaxp_parser_impl').
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 10:01:27 ossec-syscheckd: INFO: Finished creating syscheck
>>>>>>> database (pre-scan completed).
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 10:01:39 ossec-syscheckd: INFO: Ending syscheck scan
>>>>>>> (forwarding database).
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 10:01:59 ossec-syscheckd: INFO: Starting real time file 
>>>>>>> monitoring.
>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 10:01:59 ossec-rootcheck: INFO: Starting rootcheck scan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, dan (ddp) <ddp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Nothing that I can see. Even with -d it goes into the background.
>>>>>>>> DEBUG messages are logged to ossec.log
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What am I missing here?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> r...@ossec:/home/teberhard# /var/ossec/bin/ossec-logcollector -d
>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:29:47 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Starting ...
>>>>>>>>> r...@ossec:/home/teberhard# /var/ossec/bin/ossec-logcollector -dt
>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:29:57 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Starting ...
>>>>>>>>> r...@ossec:/home/teberhard# /var/ossec/bin/ossec-logcollector -d -t
>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:30:00 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Starting ...
>>>>>>>>> r...@ossec:/home/teberhard# /var/ossec/bin/ossec-logcollector -d -t -c
>>>>>>>>> /var/ossec/etc/ossec.conf
>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 09:30:10 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Starting ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:07 AM, dan (ddp) <ddp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Try running logcollector in debug mode.
>>>>>>>>>> Try it with 1 full_command to see if you can get that working. I
>>>>>>>>>> recommend the ones that aren't quite so system intensive.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's my setup:
>>>>>>>>>>  <localfile>
>>>>>>>>>>    <log_format>full_command</log_format>
>>>>>>>>>>    <command>netstat -an |grep LISTEN | grep -v '127.0.0.1'</command>
>>>>>>>>>>  </localfile>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  <rule id="510000" level="7">
>>>>>>>>>>    <if_sid>530</if_sid>
>>>>>>>>>>    <match>ossec: output: 'netstat -an |grep LISTEN</match>
>>>>>>>>>>    <check_diff />
>>>>>>>>>>    <description>Listened ports have changed.</description>
>>>>>>>>>>  </rule>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This works for me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I removed that extra white space and it doesn't appear to have 
>>>>>>>>>>> helped
>>>>>>>>>>> anything. Checking the log file..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 07:54:23 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>>>>>> of command(360): netstat -tan |grep LISTEN | grep -v$
>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 07:54:23 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>>>>>> of command(360): awk -F: '($3 == "0") {print}' /etc/$
>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 07:54:23 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>>>>>> of command(360): rpm -qa
>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 07:54:23 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>>>>>> of command(360): awk -F: '($2 == "") {print}' /etc/s$
>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 07:54:23 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Monitoring full output
>>>>>>>>>>> of command(360): find / -user root -perm -4000 -print
>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/03 07:54:23 ossec-logcollector: INFO: Started (pid: 21501).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What is the next step in troubleshooting custom rules like this? I
>>>>>>>>>>> apologize if this is a standard question.. if someone would show me
>>>>>>>>>>> how to go about this I'll do my best to spoon feed myself :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again for your help,
>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim Eberhard
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's how it sits today. I'll remove them and see if that helps 
>>>>>>>>>>>> things at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, dan (ddp) <ddp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Tim Eberhard <xmi...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [My apologies for posting this to ossec-dev. I typed in the wrong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> google group. This was intended for ossec-list]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been trying to write some rules for my lab OSSEC box and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them before we roll OSSEC out to production. I'm having some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writing rules when using the full command. I've tried to follow 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples written here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ossec.net/doc/manual/monitoring/process-monitoring.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it seems all my added checks/rules don't work properly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic info:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Linux - 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -OSSEC 2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Stand alone server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the example rule I've been trying to get to work...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check for changes to the system start up services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ossec.conf:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <localfile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <log_format>full_command</log_format>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <command> /sbin/chkconfig  --list | grep '3:on'</command>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the space in the <command> above intentional or a paste-o? I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> know if it will affect the output or not...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  </localfile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In local_rules.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <rule id="510004" level="7">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <if_sid>530</if_sid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <match>ossec: output: '/sbin/chkconfig </match>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <check_diff />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <description>The system start up services have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed</description>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  </rule>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upon changing the start up and removing an item I get an alert 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OSSEC notices the start up script file change..It just doesn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fire off my alert that I have configured.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OSSEC HIDS Notification.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010 Nov 02 07:16:40
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Received From: ossec->syscheck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rule: 553 fired (level 7) -> "File deleted. Unable to retrieve 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checksum."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Portion of the log(s):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File '/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K03yum-updatesd' was deleted. Unable to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retrieve checksum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --END OF NOTIFICATION
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone care to tell me what obvious item I'm missing? This holds 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> true
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for half a dozen items that I am using full_command for and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check. Another example is below:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check for changes to the SUID binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ossec.conf:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <localfile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <log_format>full_command</log_format>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <command> find / -user root -perm -4000 -print</command>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  </localfile>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In local_rules.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <rule id="510005" level="7">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <if_sid>530</if_sid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <match>ossec: output: 'find / -user root </match>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <check_diff />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <description>SUID root binaries have been changed</description>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  </rule>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for any assistance/input you can provide.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim Eberhard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to