On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Dayco Telecom <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dan, yes I'm reading. In fact I had been read a lot of posts for
> this error and still no luck. In fact if you read this one, earlier in
> these threads I wrote "Hi Mike, I read the post and replace the files
> that Holger attached, restart apache and OSSEC but the Web UI is still
> wrong."
>

Apologies, I thought you said you were using 0.3.

> I re-install the WUI as you suggest this morning and nothing, I ask
> about the WUI and the DB 'cause the others 2 installations was with
> the same procedure and files. This is the only one with thios error
> and is the only one in DB mode.
>
> anyway, I copied again the files os_lib_alerts.php and
> os_lib_syscheck.php in /var/www/html/ossec/lib, restart apache &
> OSSEC  but no luck! The WUI still show this:
>
> 2012 Jun 21 13:00:42 Rule Id: 502 level: 3
> Location: ossec->ossec-monitord
> Src IP: ssec started.
> Ossec server started.
>
>
>
> 2012 Jun 21 12:05:42 Rule Id: 5501 level: 3
> Location: ossec->/var/log/secure
> Src IP: 2:05:41 ossec sshd[17211]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session
> opened for user accdayco by (uid=0)
> Login session opened.
>  ** Alert 1340296548.5315: - pam,syslog,authentication_success,
> 2012 Jun 21 12:05:48 ossec->/var/log/secure
> Rule: 5501 (level 3) -> 'Login session opened.'
> Jun 21 12:05:46 ossec su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session opened for
> user root by accdayco(uid=500)
>
>
> What's next?
>

Learn PHP.

> Cheers...
>
>
>
>
> On 21 jun, 12:45, "dan (ddp)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Dayco Telecom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I did download the WUI version on the ossec.net Web page(http://
>> >www.ossec.net/files/ui/ossec-wui-0.3.tar.gz)
>>
>> > what patched version do I need?
>> > Where can I get it?
>>
>> Are you not reading the emails in this 
>> thread?https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/ossec-list/wui/ossec-list/...
>>
>> Good luck with your WUI issues.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 21 jun, 12:25, "dan (ddp)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Dayco Telecom <[email protected]> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Dan, I did install the WUI again this morning and the WUI is stil
>> >> > wrong, the WUI is v0.3
>>
>> >> > What can I do?
>>
>> >> Are you using the patched files? The ones that are supposed to work
>> >> with the new logging format? 0.3 is broken, it's dead. You have to use
>> >> the patched version.
>>
>> >> > cheers...
>>
>> >> > On 20 jun, 08:48, "dan (ddp)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Dayco Telecom <[email protected]> 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi people, my OSSEC server show.
>>
>> >> >> > WUI view:
>>
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 Rule Id: 18149 level: 3
>> >> >> > Location: (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Src IP: YNAMIC-DAYCO$
>> >> >> > Windows User Logoff.
>>
>> >> >> You're still using a broken WUI. Update it and try again.
>>
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 Rule Id: 18105 level: 4
>> >> >> > Location: (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Src IP: o user)
>> >> >> > Windows audit failure event.
>>
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 Rule Id: 18105 level: 4
>> >> >> > Location: (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Src IP: o user)
>> >> >> > Windows audit failure event.
>>
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 Rule Id: 18105 level: 4
>> >> >> > Location: (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Src IP: o user)
>> >> >> > Windows audit failure event.
>>
>> >> >> > OSSEC Alert log view:
>>
>> >> >> > ** Alert 1340139464.176284: - windows,
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Rule: 18105 (level 4) -> 'Windows audit failure event.'
>> >> >> > User: (no user)
>> >> >> > WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_FAILURE(5159): Microsoft-Windows-Security-
>> >> >> > Auditing: (no user): no domain: VDynamic-dayco.daycohost.local: The
>> >> >> > Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a bind to a local port.
>> >> >> > Application Information:  Process ID:  680  Application Name: \device
>> >> >> > \harddiskvolume1\windows\system32\lsass.exe  Network Information:
>> >> >> > Source Address:  0.0.0.0  Source Port:  53661  Protocol:  17  Filter
>> >> >> > Information:  Filter Run-Time ID: 0  Layer Name:  %%14608  Layer Run-
>> >> >> > Time ID: 36
>>
>> >> >> > ** Alert 1340139464.176940: - windows,
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Rule: 18105 (level 4) -> 'Windows audit failure event.'
>> >> >> > User: (no user)
>> >> >> > WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_FAILURE(5159): Microsoft-Windows-Security-
>> >> >> > Auditing: (no user): no domain: VDynamic-dayco.daycohost.local: The
>> >> >> > Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a bind to a local port.
>> >> >> > Application Information:  Process ID:  680  Application Name: \device
>> >> >> > \harddiskvolume1\windows\system32\lsass.exe  Network Information:
>> >> >> > Source Address:  0.0.0.0  Source Port:  53662  Protocol:  17  Filter
>> >> >> > Information:  Filter Run-Time ID: 0  Layer Name:  %%14608  Layer Run-
>> >> >> > Time ID: 36
>>
>> >> >> > ** Alert 1340139464.177596: - windows,
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Rule: 18105 (level 4) -> 'Windows audit failure event.'User: (no 
>> >> >> > user)
>> >> >> > WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_FAILURE(5159): Microsoft-Windows-Security-
>> >> >> > Auditing: (no user): no domain: VDynamic-dayco.daycohost.local: The
>> >> >> > Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a bind to a local port.
>> >> >> > Application Information:  Process ID:  1296  Application Name: 
>> >> >> > \device
>> >> >> > \harddiskvolume1\windows\system32\svchost.exe  Network Information:
>> >> >> > Source Address:  0.0.0.0  Source Port:  56759  Protocol:  17  Filter
>> >> >> > Information:  Filter Run-Time ID: 0  Layer Name:  %%14608  Layer Run-
>> >> >> > Time ID: 36
>>
>> >> >> > ** Alert 1340139464.178255: - windows,
>> >> >> > 2012 Jun 19 16:27:44 (VDynamic-dayco) 10.0.1.3->WinEvtLog
>> >> >> > Rule: 18149 (level 3) -> 'Windows User Logoff.'User: VDYNAMIC-DAYCO$
>> >> >> > WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_SUCCESS(4634): Microsoft-Windows-Security-
>> >> >> > Auditing: VDYNAMIC-DAYCO$: DAYCOHOST: VDynamic-dayco.daycohost.local:
>> >> >> > An account was logged off. Subject:  Security ID:  S-1-5-18  Account
>> >> >> > Name:  VDYNAMIC-DAYCO$  Account Domain:  DAYCOHOST  Logon ID:
>> >> >> > 0x6060269  Logon Type:   3  This event is generated when a logon
>> >> >> > session is destroyed. It may be positively correlated with a logon
>> >> >> > event using the Logon ID value. Logon IDs are only unique between
>> >> >> > reboots on the same computer."  4646,1
>>
>> >> >> > DB (MySQL) view, table Data:
>>
>> >> >> > '997', '1', '(no user)', 'WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_FAILURE(5159):
>> >> >> > Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing: (no user): no domain: VDynamic-
>> >> >> > dayco.daycohost.local: The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a
>> >> >> > bind to a local port. Application Information:  Process ID:  1296
>> >> >> > Application Name: /device/harddiskvolume1/windows/system32/
>> >> >> > svchost.exe  Network Information:  Source Address:  0.0.0.0  Source
>> >> >> > Port:  64330  Protocol:  17  Filter Information:  Filter Run-Time ID:
>> >> >> > 0  Layer Name:  %%14608  Layer Run-Time ID: 36', NULL
>> >> >> > '998', '1', '(no user)', 'WinEvtLog: System: ERROR(7001): Service
>> >> >> > Control Manager: (no user): no domain: DYC-ACCUNETIX: The WinHTTP Web
>> >> >> > Proxy Auto-Discovery Service service depends on the DHCP Client
>> >> >> > service which failed to start because of the following error:   %
>> >> >> > %1058  ', NULL
>> >> >> > '999', '1', '(no user)', 'WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_FAILURE(5159):
>> >> >> > Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing: (no user): no domain: VDynamic-
>> >> >> > dayco.daycohost.local: The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a
>> >> >> > bind to a local port. Application Information:  Process ID:  680
>> >> >> > Application Name: /device/harddiskvolume1/windows/system32/lsass.exe
>> >> >> > Network Information:  Source Address:  0.0.0.0  Source Port:  64331
>> >> >> > Protocol:  17  Filter Information:  Filter Run-Time ID: 0  Layer
>> >> >> > Name:  %%14608  Layer Run-Time ID: 36', NULL
>> >> >> > '1000', '1', '(no user)', 'WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_FAILURE(5159):
>> >> >> > Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing: (no user): no domain: VDynamic-
>> >> >> > dayco.daycohost.local: The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a
>> >> >> > bind to a local port. Application Information:  Process ID:  680
>> >> >> > Application Name: /device/harddiskvolume1/windows/system32/lsass.exe
>> >> >> > Network Information:  Source Address:  0.0.0.0  Source Port:  64332
>> >> >> > Protocol:  17  Filter Information:  Filter Run-Time ID: 0  Layer
>> >> >> > Name:  %%14608  Layer Run-Time ID: 36', NULL
>>
>> >> >> > The installation of the compiled OSSEC was install using the OSSEC
>> >> >> > books guide and the OSSEC.net documetation.
>> >> >> > The installation of the OSSEC WUI was install using the OSSEC.net
>> >> >> > documetation.
>>
>> >> >> > The others OSSEC server I installed before was on a lab with non
>> >> >> > compiled DB mode and another with compiled DB mode w/o enabling it 
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > all works fine till then
>>
>> >> >> > I choose DB Compiled this time 'cause it's a OSSEC Server for non-lab
>> >> >> > enviroment and it's going to be a Core plattform with around 500
>> >> >> > Clients, so the amount of logs can be high.
>>
>> >> >> > I don't know if some aditional configuration is necesary to WUI for
>> >> >> > read the Data from DB or if the WUI just simple read the log.
>>
>> >> >> WUI does not look at the db, just the logs.
>>
>> >> >> > * Any idea?
>> >> >> > * I need to re-configure to a non DB compiled mode to work that way?
>>
>> >> >> It should work fine with or without the db.
>>
>> >> >> > Thanks a lot!!!
>>
>> >> >> > Cheers...
>>
>> >> >> > On 19 jun, 14:55, "dan (ddp)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mike Disley
>>
>> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Yes, it's a full_command rule but I'm not using OSSEC with a DB.
>>
>> >> >> >> Oops, I didn't notice that you weren't the OP. So, yeah, you 
>> >> >> >> probably
>> >> >> >> installed the patches incorrectly.
>>
>> >> >> >> Yet another reason I avoid the WUI: I don't know php.
>>
>> >> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >> > From: [email protected] 
>> >> >> >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of dan (ddp)
>> >> >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:30 PM
>> >> >> >> > To: [email protected]
>> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: [ossec-list] Re: Error in message formating on OSSEC 
>> >> >> >> > Wui
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Mike Disley 
>> >> >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Greetings,
>> >> >> >> >> I have the same prob.  I applied the patches but no joy.  
>> >> >> >> >> Enclosed is an alert first from the WUI and the corresponding 
>> >> >> >> >> entry in alerts.log.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> OSSEC WUI Alert List:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> 2012 Jun 19 12:45:40 Rule Id: 140123 level: 7
>> >> >> >> >> Location: (someonesPC) 1x.21.1.1x4->netstat -an | findstr "\80\>
>> >> >> >> >> \443\>" | findstr TCP Src IP: utput: 'netstat -an | findstr 
>> >> >> >> >> "\80\>
>> >> >> >> >> \443\>" | findstr TCP': TCP 1X.21.1.1X4:34594 66.35.45.157:443
>> >> >> >> >> ESTABLISHED Outbound Internet Access Detected
>> >> >> >> >> ossec: output: 'netstat -an | findstr "\80\> \443\>" | findstr 
>> >> >> >> >> TCP':
>> >> >> >> >> TCP 1X.21.1.1x4:22697 23.9.96.60:443 CLOSE_WAIT
>>
>> >> >> >> >> OSSEC Server alerts.log
>>
>> >> >> >> >> ** Alert 1340124340.19381: mail...
>>
>> leer más »

Reply via email to