*hi Dan,

Thank you for your reply.

The original netscreen log message has timestamp. Log is taken from another 
syslog server.*

" 

Aug 15 10:30:14 136.10.247.130 SSG350M: NetScreen device_id=Juniper111  
[Root]system-warning-00518: Admin user "userid" login attempt for Web(http) 
management (port 20480) from 1.1.1.1:22560 failed. (2012-08-15 11:33:36)
"

*Log message on your test was a part of alert.log.

here is my Logtest results..but we are still unable to decode it. Any idea?*

Aug 15 10:30:14 136.10.247.130 SSG350M: NetScreen device_id=Juniper111  
[Root]system-warning-00518: Admin user "userid" login attempt for Web(http) 
management (port 20480) from 1.1.1.1:22560 failed. (2012-08-15 11:33:36)


**Phase 1: Completed pre-decoding.
       full event: 'Aug 15 10:30:14 136.10.247.130 SSG350M: NetScreen 
device_id=Juniper111  [Root]system-warning-00518: Admin user "userid" login 
attempt for Web(http) management (port 20480) from 1.1.1.1:22560 failed. 
(2012-08-15 11:33:36)'
       hostname: '136.10.247.130'
       program_name: 'SSG350M'
       log: 'NetScreen device_id=Juniper111  [Root]system-warning-00518: 
Admin user "userid" login attempt for Web(http) management (port 20480) 
from 1.1.1.1:22560 failed. (2012-08-15 11:33:36)'

**Phase 2: Completed decoding.
       decoder: 'netscreenfw'
       action: 'warning'
       id: '00518'

**Phase 3: Completed filtering (rules).
       Rule id: '4502'
       Level: '9'
       Description: 'Netscreen warning message.'
**Alert to be generated.




15 Ağustos 2012 Çarşamba 16:20:34 UTC+3 tarihinde dan (ddpbsd) yazdı:
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Ozgur Orhan 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi All, 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > We have issues configuring Ossec server to receive Netscreen firewall 
> > logs. Logs are decoded as syslog not netscreen firewall. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Here are my configuration steps; 
> > 
> > First, firewalls are configured sending audit logs via syslog. 
> > 
> > We changed ossec.conf file as below to allow syslog; 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > <remote> 
> > 
> >     <connection>syslog</connection> 
> > 
> >     <allowed-ips>firewall ip</allowed-ips> 
> > 
> >   </remote> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ossec services restarted without problem. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I checked with tcpdump that firewall syslog traffic is received by Ossec 
> > Server. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Here is my sample log. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Aug 15 10:30:14 136.10.247.130 SSG350M: NetScreen device_id=Juniper111 
> > [Root]system-warning-00518: Admin user "userid" login attempt for 
> Web(http) 
> > management (port 20480) from 1.1.1.1:22560 failed. (2012-08-15 
> 11:33:36) 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-logtest shows logs from netscreen device decoded 
> > properly. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > **Phase 1: Completed pre-decoding. 
> > 
> >        full event: 'Aug 15 10:30:14 136.10.247.130 SSG350M: NetScreen 
> > device_id=Juniper111  [Root]system-warning-00518: Admin user "userid" 
> login 
> > attempt for Web(http) management (port 20480) from 1.1.1.1:22560failed. 
> > (2012-08-15 11:33:36)' 
> > 
> >        hostname: '1.1.1.1' 
> > 
> >        program_name: 'SSG350M' 
> > 
> >        log: 'NetScreen device_id=Juniper111 [Root]system-warning-00518: 
> > Admin user "userid" login attempt for Web(http) management (port 20480) 
> from 
> > 1.1.1.1:22560 failed. (2012-08-15 11:33:36)' 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > **Phase 2: Completed decoding. 
> > 
> >        decoder: 'netscreenfw' 
> > 
> >        action: 'warning' 
> > 
> >        id: '00518' 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > **Phase 3: Completed filtering (rules). 
> > 
> >        Rule id: '4502' 
> > 
> >        Level: '9' 
> > 
> >        Description: 'Netscreen warning message.' 
> > 
> > **Alert to be generated. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > No logs/alerts occured on /var/ossec/logs/firewall/firewall.log. 
> > 
> > I checked /var/ossec/logs/alerts/alerts.log and a log about syslog 
> > process. It seems log is decoded as syslog. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ** Alert 1345026945.197836: - 
> syslog,access_control,authentication_failed, 
> > 
> > 2012 Aug 15 13:35:45 logyon->1.1.1.1 
> > 
> > Rule: 2501 (level 5) -> 'User authentication failure.' 
> > 
> > SSG350M: NetScreen device_id=Juniper111 [Root]system-warning-00518: ADM: 
> > Local admin authentication failed for login name userid: invalid 
> password 
> > (2012-08-15 14:39:22) 
> > 
>
> It looks like the log message sent to OSSEC is different than the log 
> message you tested above. This log message doesn't have the timestamp 
> at the beginning. 
>
> **Phase 1: Completed pre-decoding. 
>        full event: 'SSG350M: NetScreen device_id=Juniper111 
> [Root]system-warning-00518: ADM: Local admin authentication failed for 
> login name userid: invalid password (2012-08-15 14:39:22)' 
>        hostname: 'arrakis' 
>        program_name: '(null)' 
>        log: 'SSG350M: NetScreen device_id=Juniper111 
> [Root]system-warning-00518: ADM: Local admin authentication failed for 
> login name userid: invalid password (2012-08-15 14:39:22)' 
>
> **Phase 2: Completed decoding. 
>        No decoder matched. 
>
> **Phase 3: Completed filtering (rules). 
>        Rule id: '2501' 
>        Level: '5' 
>        Description: 'User authentication failure.' 
> **Alert to be generated. 
>
>
> > 
> > 
> > I couldn’t find what I am missing.  Any help would be greatly 
> > appreciated.. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Regards, 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ozgur 
> > 
> > Bu e-posta icindeki bilgiler ve/veya mesajla iletilen butun dosyalar 
> > sadece gondericisi tarafindan almasi amaclanan yetkili kisinin kullanimi 
> > icindir ve gizlilik icerebilir. Eger bu e-posta size yanlislikla 
> ulasmissa, 
> > icerigini hicbir sekilde kullanmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen ilgili 
> e-postayi 
> > mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz ve gonderen kisiyi uyariniz. 
> > 
> > The information in this message and/or attachments is intended solely 
> for 
> > the attention and use of the named addressee and may be confidential. If 
> you 
> > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have 
> > received this transmittal in error and that any use of it is strictly 
> > prohibited. In such a case please delete this message and kindly notify 
> the 
> > sender accordingly. 
>

Reply via email to