On Feb 10, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Lawrence Sica wrote:
On Feb 9, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Roger Howard wrote:
On Feb 9, 2009, at 1:11 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Feb 9, 2009, at 12:04, Mark Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Kevin Callahan <[email protected]>
wrote:
I really hope people are held accountable for this
That would make for a refreshing change.
It would, but we all know nothing is going to happen.
Obama fails first test on civil liberties and accountability
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/09/state_secrets/
I am curious the full reasoning. There must be something pretty bad
in there when you consider all the other things he is doing. T
So that would imply that Bush might have been right to keep it a state
secret no?
his is not really the first test imho. Not something I was hoping
they'd do.
Me either unless it truly affects national security.
I noticed that Obama's rhetoric changed dramatically after his first
series of security briefing.
I have to assume that Bush said. "Here.. Now you know the true extent
of the threat. Man am I glad to shed the burden. God bless and good
luck."
=c=
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
