On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:11 AM, David Cake wrote:

>       I think this is kind of an absurd oversimplification at best,
> and propaganda at worst -- the idea that the Ivy League universities
> are a global nexus of Marxism is a little ridiculous. That is why the
> CIA likes to recruit from Ivy League universities, right? (the CIA is
> particularly fond of Yale).
>       And it certainly glosses over the way the US didn't just give
> the traditionalists guns and missiles-- it made a dedicated effort
> (in cooperation with the Saudis) at making the traditionalists more
> aligned to religious fanaticism, because it helped them recruit and
> link up with covert backers in other countries, particularly the
> Middle East.

When did you loose all sense or irony? Do I have to start putting   
winky faces in every post. The fact remains that social progressivism  
and Marxism were linked in much of the 3rd world and theat the Afghan  
elites were largely educated in the west.

>       Most of the women in Afghanistan haven't been 'indoctrinated
> since birth' - the Taliban took power in 1996. The Taliban are far
> more repressive to women than the native Afghani Islamic traditions
> were, and considerably more so than other variants of Pushtuni tribal
> Islam from which the Taliban sprung.

It's simply false to portray the relatively moderate traditions of  
Kabul as somehow more "native" than the traditions of the southern  
part of the country. It is also simply false to characterize  
repressive customs as "Islamic". There are many Islamic areas that are  
not repressive and non-Islamic groups in the middle east, like the  
Yezidi, who are extremely repressive. For most women in most of  
Afghanistan for most of history life is simply shit. The Taliban  
simply reimposed social traditions on a minority that had temporarily  
escaped it.

>       While I wouldn't want to say even a slightly kind word about
> the degenerate old creep Jeffs and his hideous coterie - they didn't
> murder those who opposed them.

The murders have been alleged but not proved. The rape and beatings  
are documented. It is simply that the US legal system can't prosecute  
on hearsay and the victims themselves won't testify. I suspect the  
difference here is simply that you require a higher standard of proof  
when the perpetrators are FLDS than when they are Moslem. I accuse any  
FLDS member you want of murder for $1,000.


-
God must have loved the people in power, for he made them so much  
like  their own image of him.
-Kenneth Patchen

_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to