On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jared Earle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 Mar 2009, at 17:27, Mark Smith wrote: >> The "rivals" are, in my experience, only vastly superior (if at all) >> on paper, but hardly different in use. Titchy sensor, crappy glass and >> lousy geometry cannot be compensated by pixels, and/or moving parts. > > > I've done side-by-side photos with a Renoir, an iPhone and a decent > Sony jobbie. The other phones produced vastly superior photos.
Got to take you at your word on that. I haven't done side by sides. I've just never had a phone in my hand that produced photos anywhere near as good as those from an aging Sony DSC T9. I'll concede though, that an in-phone camera could in theory be vastly better than the iphone but significantly worse than the DSC T9, for certain values of "vastly"... _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
