On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:03:20 -0700, Chris Gehlker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's an idea. Why don't we change the method for estimating > unemployment Pretty sure they've already done that... from what I've heard, the real numbers of unemployed are always significantly higher than what's reported, because the reports don't cover "discouraged workers", the "underemployed" (people who get 10 hours a week as a Walmart greeter when they were assembling cars before), etc _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
