On 07.12.2009, at 11:30, Christian Brunschen wrote: > On 30 Nov 2009, at 21:35, Mark Smith wrote: > >> So I took the time to write a shorter response. I was way up in the >> thousands of words when I decided to do a radical edit... >> >> Chuck is right to rant on the big general issue. Its one huge, >> horrible scandal. > > Well, there's also the difference between the superficial appearance > of a few things taken out of context ... and what appears when putting > things back _into_ context, as well as when looking at more than just > the 'juiciest bits'. > > This video seems offer a bit of a more rational perspective: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
More or less what I was saying... >> However, it seems to me to be fuzzier in some of the >> details than the outraged (busy as ever being righteously and >> flagrantly outraged) are allowing. I doubt we are going to get the >> cool reflection that we obviously need. There are far too many people >> who won't be able to resist getting the big white pointy hats out of >> the cupboard. but maybe that "some" should have been a "most" _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
