Hello Aaron:

Thanks for writing back.

I  really  don't  think  that  I'm  against  exercise  as  a form for health
promotion.  I  guess  I just hate to see OT's fall into the trap of thinking
that exercise is the 'only' or even best way to promote health.

It  seems  that  our brothers and sister in arms (i.e. PT's) are leading the
way  on  exercise as the great cure-all for a 'sick' society. I believe that
occupation (which certainly includes exercise) is probably a better approach
to health and I just want to share that opinion with others.

Lastly,  whether  exercise  is or isn't an occupation is really dependent on
the  person  doing the exercise. I've seen and probably prescribed, exercise
for  many people who couldn't give a darn about what it was doing to them or
for them. For these people, exercise is NOT an occupation. However, like you
say,  exercise  CAN  certainly  be  an  occupation for those people who find
meaning,  value  and a sense of identity by engaging in it.

But for everyone who does find such value in exercise, there are many others
who  don't.  So,  what  do  we  do  for  those  people who will benefit from
increased  activity  but  don't find exercise to be an occupation of choice.
Simple,  we  help  them find occupation of choice that involves some form of
physical activity.

I guess the bottom line is I just believe in promoting occupation.

Ron

~~~~~
On 6/23/02, aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

ae> Ron,

ae> You've been going on a bit here, haven't you.

ae> Exercise is a useful occupation in health promotion.  It likely does enhance
ae> physiological functioning.  It likely does promote enhanced mood and
ae> self-concept, and such.  And I would assert that for many participating in
ae> it, it would be a "personally relevant and meaningful (i.e. occupation)".

ae> Is exercise in and of itself the nirvana of all occupations?  Clearly not,
ae> but by this line of thinking neither are collecting, or painting, or growing
ae> a business, or raising a child.  Many occupations chosen and directed by the
ae> individual weave that persons "tapestry of life".  One of those chosen
ae> occupations may be exersice.

ae> I would be interested to know, Ron, why you appear to be so passionate
ae> against "exercise" as an occupational form for health promotion.

ae> Aaron Eakman



ae> ----- Original Message -----
ae> From: "Ron Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ae> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ae> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 5:38 AM
ae> Subject: exercise versus occupation


>> Hey:
>>
>> Everywhere  I  go,  I  keep hearing the term, "exercise" as a way to
ae> promote
>> health.  I  really  believe  that people are often using the term
ae> "exercise"
>> when  of course they really mean occupation. When someone talks about
ae> having
>> an  active  lifestyle,  more time than not, they are talking about having
ae> an
>> occupationally  full life. In other words, a life that may include
ae> exercise,
>> but  almost  always  includes  many  other  forms  of  non-exercise
ae> related
>> activities.
>>
>> Many people exercise and are still mentally and emotionally unhealthy.
ae> Where
>> as,  if  these  people were to engage in occupation that was challenging
ae> and
>> successful, they would develop a greater sense of competence and
ae> self-worth.
>> Putting  a  client  on stationary bicycle and believing that this is
ae> someone
>> going to improve their health is narrow minded. Of course, OT's often
ae> define
>> health differently than other health care professions.
>>
>> >From  an  OT  perspective, health is NOT measured in terms of oxygen
ae> uptake,
>> heart  rate,  blood  pressure,  etc.  Health is measured by one's ability
ae> to
>> SUCCESSFULLY  engage  in activity that is personally relevant and
ae> meaningful
>> (i.e. occupation).
>>
>> However,  being able to engage in occupation is infinitely more complex
ae> than
>> simply  increasing  physiological function. Too many times, exercise is
ae> seen
>> as a 'cure all' for our health problems and for some, simple exercise may
ae> be
>> a  great  answer.  But  for many others, health problems (defined as loss
ae> of
>> occupational  performance  competence) will not be alleviated nor reduced
ae> by
>> exercise.
>>
>> Again, occupation is the name of the game.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> *********��***********
>>
>> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>>
>> ** List messages are archived at:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>
>> *********��***********
>>

ae> *********��***********

ae> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ae> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

ae> ** List messages are archived at:

ae> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

ae> *********��***********

*********��***********

Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

** List messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

*********��***********

Reply via email to