Dear Listserve, 

 

In my 13 years as an OT, I've never been confronted with this situation.
I have worked with adults and geriatric patients throughout my career.
In my best attempt to cover for a pediatric OT several days this week, I
have a treatment plan for a 15 year old girl that involves bathing.  I'm
a guy, a guy that feels uncomfortable working on this activity with a
girl of that age group, where modesty is even more of an issue than is
in for older females.  It goes without saying that I would have a female
present throughout the entire treatment involving bathing.  But in this
situation, no other OT's are any more experienced in pediatrics than I
am and this patient has been assigned to me.  Would I defer the bathing
to a non-OT?  In so doing, I would not be following the treatment plan
and I would be deferring the training to a non-skilled professional.  I
would appreciate any timely guidance that anyone could offer me.

 

Thank you,

Curtis

 

-----Original Message-----
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of otlist-requ...@otnow.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:23 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: OTlist Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1

 

Send OTlist mailing list submissions to

      otlist@otnow.com

 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

      http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

      otlist-requ...@otnow.com

 

You can reach the person managing the list at

      otlist-ow...@otnow.com

 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

than "Re: Contents of OTlist digest..."

 

 

Today's Topics:

 

   1. Re: A Typical Day, Is this Normal? (Carmen Aguirre)

   2. promoting OT (Alayna Adams)

   3. Welcome to Our Newest Member(s) (Ron Carson)

   4. Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even

      Possible? (Ron Carson)

   5. Re: Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it even

      Possible? (Audra Ray)

   6. Re: Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it even

      Possible? (Lucy Simpson)

   7. Re: Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it even

      Possible? (Ron Carson)

   8. Re: Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even

      Possible? (Carmen Aguirre)

   9. Re: Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it even

      Possible? (cmnahrw...@aol.com)

  10. Re: Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it even

      Possible? (Ron Carson)

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Message: 1

Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:53:51 +0000

From: Carmen Aguirre <caguirr...@msn.com>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] A Typical Day, Is this Normal?

To: <otlist@otnow.com>

Message-ID: <col112-w28babcbc1f6f7e57418af8dd...@phx.gbl>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

 

 

If you are expected to be at 90% , 435 minutes will do it. It is
possible to do it if you do some indiv tx in am, for instance, and some
concurrent with some in the afternoon on certain days. On the other days
concur some of the others or designate those appropriate for a group
session. The extra time may help gain some "quiet" time for some
uninterrupted notes... Not easy though...

 

 

Carmen

 

 

 

 

> To: OTlist@OTnow.com

> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:54:42 -0400

> From: cmnahrw...@aol.com

> Subject: Re: [OTlist] A Typical Day, Is this Normal?

> 

> Sounds like some overtime to me. Not appropriate to complete within a 

> 8 hour work day with time for notes and conferences.

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Brent Cheyne <brentche...@yahoo.com>

> To: Ron Carson <otlist@otnow.com>

> Sent: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 6:53 am

> Subject: [OTlist] A Typical Day, Is this Normal?

> 

> There have been some very excellent and insightful posts recently and
I 

> need to go back and read them a second time before I respond..very 

> thought provoking....

> Over the past "busy season" at my place of work I've been having a
very 

> challenging caseload. Please review the circumstances and decide if it


> is a normal/comfortable work condition

>  

>  

> In an 8 hour day I have to treat and do daily notes, 1 weekly note, 

> attend  1 weekly staff meeting and attend 1-2 care plan meetings.

>  

> 1. 91 yo female, femur fx nwb-max assist ADL, wants to go home 

> alone-60min

> 2 91 yo female, sternal fx max assist ADL, want to go home alone-60
min 

> (Eval today)

> 3 85 yo female, total knee replacement  ADL with supervision but 

> encouragement 45min

> 4 82 yo female, distal radial fracture-ADL with minimal assit-home 

> alone-60 min

> 5 81 yo male, total hip revision-ADL with minimal assist and encourge-


> to live alone 60 min

> 6 77 you female, CVA Aphasic right hemi- max assist self care- to live


> with spouse -60 min

> 7 63 yo female, Multiple sclerosis, max assist ADL, home with spouse, 

> 60 min

> 8 74 yo fe

> mal, CVA right hemi-max assist ADL, r/oSNF placement , 60 

> minutes

> 9 65 yo male, Parkinson  stand by assist ADL, home with spouse who 

> works, 60 min

>  

> So I'm scheduled to see these people today... about 465 minutes of 

> treatment,5/9 patiens are maximal assist,   all this week, did this
all 

> last week

> Does this sound like a reasonable and appropriate schedule?

> Am I going to be able to get through it and still provide that 

> meaningful and effective, individualized treatment that will create a 

> great public relations image?

> Give me some feedback

> Brent

>  

>  

> 

> 

> 

> --

> Options?

> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

> 

> Archive?

> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

> 

> 

> 

> --

> Options?

> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

> 

> Archive?

> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

_________________________________________________________________

Rediscover Hotmail?: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox. 

http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover
_Updates1_042009

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 2

Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:51:30 -0700 (PDT)

From: Alayna Adams <powrpufgurl_...@yahoo.com>

Subject: [OTlist] promoting OT

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Message-ID: <537522.36451...@web50405.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 

Hi everyone,I am going to write a letter to the editor of my local
newspaper to promote OT for OT month. I would appreciate any feedback.
Sorry about the format being off.?To celebrate Occupational Therapy (OT)
month, I would like to inform our community on what OT is and how it
benefits residents. OT is a type of rehabilitation that aims to help
people with a physical, developmental, or cognitive disability increase
independence with everyday occupations including but not limited to
dressing, cooking, bathing and leisure. Occupational therapists work in
hospitals, nursing homes, schools, rehabilitation facilities, mental
health facilities and a variety of other settings with people of all
ages and abilities.??????????? OT benefits patients and family members
by improving their ability to take care of themselves and live more
independently. OT treatment consists of adapting the environment and
recommending equipment such as tub benches,

 reachers and magnifiers to enable a person to complete activities of
daily living. OT will work with patients to improve moibility,
cognition, and activity tolerance to regain function in order to live as
independently as possible. ??????????? Many of our elderly community
members have received OT and are able to return home without services or
significant help from family or caregivers. Occupational Therapists can
complete home evaluations and recommend adaptations as necessary. OT
will train and educate caregivers to enable them to help their loved
ones live a life with dignity and independence. ??????????? Infants and
children are able to reach developmental milestones and perform better
in school with the skilled treatment of OT. People with a mental illness
can learn new habits and roles to enable them to contribute to society.
A teenager with a spinal cord injury could learn of adaptations to allow
them to go to college and

 complete self care. ??????????? Many people are unaware of what
occupational therapy is because of the title. Occupation is what we do
everyday of our lives, what makes our life meaningful to us.
Occupational Therapy is a profession that can help people regain
function to live life to the fullest.Alayna Adams,Occupational Therapist

 

 

      

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 3

Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:59:32 -0400

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Subject: [OTlist] Welcome to Our Newest Member(s)

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Message-ID: <851391650.20090420065...@otnow.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

 

Welcome to our newest member(s):

 

#####################################

 

kokme...@bronsonhg.org

 

tthom...@stormontvail.org

 

Tiffany <tiffanyd...@comcast.net>

 

Donna <dcolaia...@hsc.wvu.edu>

 

Colleen   <colle...@bellsouth.net>

 

Shannon Brown <sabrown...@gmail.com>

 

jwh...@challiance.org

 

Terri <pixie...@hotmail.com>

 

Aadil <aa...@360customer.com>

 

t...@yahoo.com

 

 

#####################################

 

I  want to personally welcome our 10 newest members!! Thanks for joining

and  please  feel  welcome  to  post  messages  on any topic relating to

occupation or occupational therapy.

 

Keep spreading the word!

 

Thanks,

 

Ron

 

~~~

Ron Carson MHS, OT

www.OTnow.com

 

 

 

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 4

Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:06:29 -0400

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even

      Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Message-ID: <547513938.20090420190...@otnow.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

 

Hello All:

 

A  couple  weeks  ago,  I  worked  with a CVA patient who despite having

multiple  occupational  deficits,  he  was  unwilling  to  verbalize any

OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was d/c'd.

 

The  patient's  UE  and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had almost no

active  movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely painful

during any AROM.

 

I  initially  told  the  patient that as an OT, I would address his most

important  occupations  but  that I could do nothing about his arm. Over

the  course  of  treatment,  his wife reported having difficulty bathing

under  the  patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded that

there  was  a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic appointment

was  necessary.  I  conferred  with  the  PT  and  she  concurred. I
also

confirmed   that   the   treating   PTA   would   address  the  shoulder

ROM/Pain.

 

Last  Friday,  I  received  a new referral for this same patient. When I

questioned  it, I was told that:

 

        "...[PT  saw the patient] and he has some issues so nursing

        went  back in and she felt OT needed back in also so we received

        an order to do an eval and treat."

 

Based  on this my ever so sweet scheduler made an appt with the patient.

At  this  point I had no idea why OT was called back in but suspected it

was an arm "thing".

 

Just  by  coincidence,  before  my scheduled appointment, I ran into the

treating PTA. When I asked her about the referral she confirmed that the

PT  wanted  OT  to  address  the  patient's  arm. The PTA said that they

thought  a different OT than myself would be sent to the patient. And if

fact,  I  was  later called by my homehealth office and "advised" that I

didn't need to see the patient because it was an shoulder thing and they

understood that I don't do shoulders.

 

I've  written  countless  paragraphs  about  breaking  the  'band  of UE

therapy',  but  at this point, I'm thinking it may not even be possible.

What  is the message when one OT says "no" to focused shoulder treatment

while others cordially say "yes". Heck, at this point I'm confused!

 

Sadly yours,

 

Ron

 

~~~

Ron Carson MHS, OT

www.OTnow.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 5

Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:17:32 -0700 (PDT)

From: Audra Ray <audra...@yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it

      even Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Message-ID: <491584.58897...@web45514.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 

Ron, 

?

 

I would have been one of those OTs that treated the patient. His
caregiver had a goal to bathe under the patient's arm. As an OT trained
in physical disabilities, I know how to treat a shoulder impingement and
would have. I know I'll probably get railed at, but this is how my
treatment plan would have gone:?? the patient has pain with ROM, so
treat the pain; strengthen what can be strengthened to also reduce pain
and probably fix a possible subluxation; patient/caregiver education to
continue home exercise program to maintain what is gained. By doing
these things, the patient/caregiver is now able to meet his occupational
goal of washing under his arm. 

The?goal would have been written as follows: The patient/caregiver will
bathe under affected arm without pain or discomfort.

?

I had a patient recently discharged that came to me saying her arm/neck
was killing her. Her goals were as follows:

-decrease pain.

-be able to use arm in daily occupations without discomfort.

I helped her do just that. We used PAMs to decrease her pain, which took
over a month to do. She used to have a flat affect and slept alot
because of all the pain medicine she took. Now she is smiling, going to
activities frequently, and has 0/10 pain with daily occupations.

I did my job as an OT to make someone's life better.

?

Audra Ray, OTR/L

?

What I don't understand is why you only follow one Model: MOHO?? There
are many models that we base treatment on. 

?

 

 

--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com> wrote:

 

 

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even
Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 4:06 PM

 

 

Hello All:

 

A? couple? weeks? ago,? I? worked? with a CVA patient who despite having

multiple? occupational? deficits,? he? was? unwilling? to? verbalize any

OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was d/c'd.

 

The? patient's? UE? and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had almost no

active? movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely painful

during any AROM.

 

I? initially? told? the? patient that as an OT, I would address his most

important? occupations? but? that I could do nothing about his arm. Over

the? course? of? treatment,? his wife reported having difficulty bathing

under? the? patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded that

there? was? a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic appointment

was? necessary.? I? conferred? with? the? PT? and? she? concurred. I
also

confirmed???that???the???treating???PTA???would???address? the? shoulder

ROM/Pain.

 

Last? Friday,? I? received? a new referral for this same patient. When I

questioned? it, I was told that:

 

? ? ? ? "...[PT? saw the patient] and he has some issues so nursing

? ? ? ? went? back in and she felt OT needed back in also so we received

? ? ? ? an order to do an eval and treat."

 

Based? on this my ever so sweet scheduler made an appt with the patient.

At? this? point I had no idea why OT was called back in but suspected it

was an arm "thing".

 

Just? by? coincidence,? before? my scheduled appointment, I ran into the

treating PTA. When I asked her about the referral she confirmed that the

PT? wanted? OT? to? address? the? patient's? arm. The PTA said that they

thought? a different OT than myself would be sent to the patient. And if

fact,? I? was? later called by my homehealth office and "advised" that I

didn't need to see the patient because it was an shoulder thing and they

understood that I don't do shoulders.

 

I've? written? countless? paragraphs? about? breaking? the? 'band? of UE

therapy',? but? at this point, I'm thinking it may not even be
possible..

What? is the message when one OT says "no" to focused shoulder treatment

while others cordially say "yes". Heck, at this point I'm confused!

 

Sadly yours,

 

Ron

 

~~~

Ron Carson MHS, OT

www.OTnow.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

--

Options?

www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

Archive?

www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

 

 

      

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 6

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:03:20 +0000 (GMT)

From: Lucy Simpson <lucy_simpso...@yahoo.co.uk>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it

      even Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Message-ID: <500549.42714...@web23302.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 

Audra/Ron

?

I appreciate Ron that you feel as OT's we should not look at UE
exclusively e.g. to increase ROM or reduce pain, but is it ever
exclusive??

?

?As, with Audra's example the outcome of addressing reduced ROM and pain
is likely to be an increase in independence, quality of life and
participation in occupations. Effective UE's are the pre-requisite for
participating in activities so if not addressed, alongside functional
goals?we miss?a huge area of potential in our patients. 

?

There are?times that the pain and movement issues need to be addressed
before we can attempt effective participation in activities. Certainly
in the UK we have OT's working in critical care ensuring patients are
positioned and passively moved through ROM to reduce contractures, and
to maintain ROM with the expectation that this gives them the optimal
chance of participating in occupation in the future,?once they are
medically stable........

?

I am seeing a lady who has had a stroke currently who has made great
progress from being bed bound, disorientated and flat affect?- walking
short distances with no aid, completeing personal care tasks
independently and preparing and planning simple meals. 

?

She has memory, behavioural and cogntive deficits which we are
developing strategies to manage and she has reduced ROM in her shoulder,
reduced fine motor control and sensation in her hand. This is limiting
her ability to reach up to cupboards, shelves (e.g. when shopping), she
struggles to dry and dress herself and it affects her?ability to write. 

?

Now that?many of this lady's deficits have been addressed (rehabbed or
compensated for) it is apparent that?the?reduced efficiency of her?UE is
playing an important part in her continued deficits. In order for her
arm and hand to be effective her shoulder needs to be stable, and
strengthened, she currently is following a program of shoulder exercises
in supine, provided by Physio and OT in collaboration. Along with this
she continues to be encouraged to use her Right UE in functional
activities, and activities are set up to encourage reach, grip and fine
motor control, and normal movement is promoted.

?

In this case do you feel Ron that it is the physio's role to work on the
base of UE strength and ROM, and the OT to take over and promote normal
movement in functional activities??

?

I am not sure, in my experience joint OT/PT?working is often effective
(if possible!),?certainly this?lady requires specific UE exercises as
purely using arm in function is not making a significant
difference.........

?

Kind Regards 

 

Lucy Simpson 

 

 

For Quality Stationery and Greetings Cards check out?this website: 

www.phoenix-trading.co.uk/web/lucysimpson 

Save it in your favourites for the next time you need cards.

?

 

--- On Tue, 21/4/09, Audra Ray <audra...@yahoo.com> wrote:

 

From: Audra Ray <audra...@yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it
even Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Date: Tuesday, 21 April, 2009, 3:17 AM

 

Ron, 

?

 

I would have been one of those OTs that treated the patient. His
caregiver had

a goal to bathe under the patient's arm. As an OT trained in physical

disabilities, I know how to treat a shoulder impingement and would have.
I know

I'll probably get railed at, but this is how my treatment plan would
have

gone:?? the patient has pain with ROM, so treat the pain; strengthen
what can

be strengthened to also reduce pain and probably fix a possible
subluxation;

patient/caregiver education to continue home exercise program to
maintain what

is gained. By doing these things, the patient/caregiver is now able to
meet his

occupational goal of washing under his arm. 

The?goal would have been written as follows: The patient/caregiver will
bathe

under affected arm without pain or discomfort.

?

I had a patient recently discharged that came to me saying her arm/neck
was

killing her. Her goals were as follows:

-decrease pain.

-be able to use arm in daily occupations without discomfort.

I helped her do just that. We used PAMs to decrease her pain, which took
over a

month to do. She used to have a flat affect and slept alot because of
all the

pain medicine she took. Now she is smiling, going to activities
frequently, and

has 0/10 pain with daily occupations.

I did my job as an OT to make someone's life better.

?

Audra Ray, OTR/L

?

What I don't understand is why you only follow one Model: MOHO?? There
are

many models that we base treatment on. 

?

 

 

--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com> wrote:

 

 

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even

Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 4:06 PM

 

 

Hello All:

 

A? couple? weeks? ago,? I? worked? with a CVA patient who despite having

multiple? occupational? deficits,? he? was? unwilling? to? verbalize any

OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was d/c'd.

 

The? patient's? UE? and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had almost no

active? movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely painful

during any AROM.

 

I? initially? told? the? patient that as an OT, I would address his most

important? occupations? but? that I could do nothing about his arm. Over

the? course? of? treatment,? his wife reported having difficulty bathing

under? the? patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded that

there? was? a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic appointment

was? necessary.? I? conferred? with? the? PT? and? she? concurred. I

also

confirmed???that???the???treating???PTA???would???address?

the? shoulder

ROM/Pain.

 

Last? Friday,? I? received? a new referral for this same patient. When I

questioned? it, I was told that:

 

? ? ? ? "...[PT? saw the patient] and he has some issues so nursing

? ? ? ? went? back in and she felt OT needed back in also so we received

? ? ? ? an order to do an eval and treat."

 

Based? on this my ever so sweet scheduler made an appt with the patient.

At? this? point I had no idea why OT was called back in but suspected it

was an arm "thing".

 

Just? by? coincidence,? before? my scheduled appointment, I ran into the

treating PTA. When I asked her about the referral she confirmed that the

PT? wanted? OT? to? address? the? patient's? arm. The PTA said that

they

thought? a different OT than myself would be sent to the patient. And if

fact,? I? was? later called by my homehealth office and "advised"

that I

didn't need to see the patient because it was an shoulder thing and they

understood that I don't do shoulders.

 

I've? written? countless? paragraphs? about? breaking? the?

'band? of UE

therapy',? but? at this point, I'm thinking it may not even be

possible..

What? is the message when one OT says "no" to focused shoulder

treatment

while others cordially say "yes". Heck, at this point I'm

confused!

 

Sadly yours,

 

Ron

 

~~~

Ron Carson MHS, OT

www.OTnow.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

--

Options?

www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

Archive?

www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

 

 

      

--

Options?

www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

Archive?

www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

 

 

      

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 7

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:32:47 -0400

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it

      even Possible?

To: Audra Ray <OTlist@OTnow.com>

Message-ID: <1426569795.20090421073...@otnow.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 

Thanks for writing.

 

Maybe  this  is  one  of  the  cases  were  I was over zealous about NOT

treating someone's arm. But, I truly feel that PT is much better trained

and in my case, licensed, to treat bio-mechanical issues. It just floors

me that a PT would refer back to OT for shoulder treatment.

 

Here's some things to consider:

 

1. Why do OT's treat arms and not legs?

 

2. Aren't MOST PT's better trained to treat physical dysfunction?

 

3.  Where  is  the  line  between focused treatment on an UE and focused

treatment   on   occupation?   Can   both   co-exist   with   the   same

patient/therapist?

 

This is a very confusing case for me!

 

Ron

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Audra Ray <audra...@yahoo.com>

Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009

To:   OTlist@OTnow.com <OTlist@OTnow.com>

Subj: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even
Possible?

 

AR> Ron, 

AR> ?

 

AR> I would have been one of those OTs that treated the patient. His

AR> caregiver had a goal to bathe under the patient's arm. As an OT

AR> trained in physical disabilities, I know how to treat a shoulder

AR> impingement and would have. I know I'll probably get railed at, but

AR> this is how my treatment plan would have gone:?? the patient has

AR> pain with ROM, so treat the pain; strengthen what can be

AR> strengthened to also reduce pain and probably fix a possible

AR> subluxation; patient/caregiver education to continue home exercise

AR> program to maintain what is gained. By doing these things, the

AR> patient/caregiver is now able to meet his occupational goal of
washing under his arm.

AR> The?goal would have been written as follows: The patient/caregiver

AR> will bathe under affected arm without pain or discomfort.

AR> ?

AR> I had a patient recently discharged that came to me saying her

AR> arm/neck was killing her. Her goals were as follows:

AR> -decrease pain.

AR> -be able to use arm in daily occupations without discomfort.

AR> I helped her do just that. We used PAMs to decrease her pain, which

AR> took over a month to do. She used to have a flat affect and slept

AR> alot because of all the pain medicine she took. Now she is smiling,

AR> going to activities frequently, and has 0/10 pain with daily
occupations.

AR> I did my job as an OT to make someone's life better.

AR> ?

AR> Audra Ray, OTR/L

AR> ?

AR> What I don't understand is why you only follow one Model: MOHO??

AR> There are many models that we base treatment on. 

AR> ?

 

 

AR> --- On Mon, 4/20/09, Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com> wrote:

 

 

AR> From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

AR> Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it
even Possible?

AR> To: OTlist@OTnow.com

AR> Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 4:06 PM

 

 

AR> Hello All:

 

AR> A? couple? weeks? ago,? I? worked? with a CVA patient who despite
having

AR> multiple? occupational? deficits,? he? was? unwilling? to? verbalize
any

AR> OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was
d/c'd.

 

AR> The? patient's? UE? and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had
almost no

AR> active? movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely
painful

AR> during any AROM.

 

AR> I? initially? told? the? patient that as an OT, I would address his
most

AR> important? occupations? but? that I could do nothing about his arm.
Over

AR> the? course? of? treatment,? his wife reported having difficulty
bathing

AR> under? the? patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded
that

AR> there? was? a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic
appointment

AR> was? necessary.? I? conferred? with? the? PT? and? she? concurred. I
also

AR> confirmed???that???the???treating???PTA???would???address? the?
shoulder

AR> ROM/Pain.

 

AR> Last? Friday,? I? received? a new referral for this same patient.
When I

AR> questioned? it, I was told that:

 

AR> ? ? ? ? "...[PT? saw the patient] and he has some issues so nursing

AR> ? ? ? ? went? back in and she felt OT needed back in also so we
received

AR> ? ? ? ? an order to do an eval and treat."

 

AR> Based? on this my ever so sweet scheduler made an appt with the
patient.

AR> At? this? point I had no idea why OT was called back in but
suspected it

AR> was an arm "thing".

 

AR> Just? by? coincidence,? before? my scheduled appointment, I ran into
the

AR> treating PTA. When I asked her about the referral she confirmed that
the

AR> PT? wanted? OT? to? address? the? patient's? arm. The PTA said that
they

AR> thought? a different OT than myself would be sent to the patient.
And if

AR> fact,? I? was? later called by my homehealth office and "advised"
that I

AR> didn't need to see the patient because it was an shoulder thing and
they

AR> understood that I don't do shoulders.

 

AR> I've? written? countless? paragraphs? about? breaking? the? 'band?
of UE

AR> therapy',? but? at this point, I'm thinking it may not even be
possible..

AR> What? is the message when one OT says "no" to focused shoulder
treatment

AR> while others cordially say "yes". Heck, at this point I'm confused!

 

AR> Sadly yours,

 

AR> Ron

 

AR> ~~~

AR> Ron Carson MHS, OT

AR> www.OTnow.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR> --

AR> Options?

AR> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

AR> Archive?

AR> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

 

 

AR>       

AR> --

AR> Options?

AR> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

AR> Archive?

AR> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

 

 

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 8

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:12:07 +0000

From: Carmen Aguirre <caguirr...@msn.com>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it

      even Possible?

To: <otlist@otnow.com>

Message-ID: <col112-w31f28450e6f725becb7edbdd...@phx.gbl>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

 

 

I think treating the shoulder seemed to be warranted given the
limitations it brough about to pt's and caregiver routines at home. It
seemed to be related to safety, prevention of further limitation in his
adl's or caregivers ability to care for him appropriately. Techniques
applied such as bilateral integration, re-education during those adl
tasks the caregiver seemed to be having difficulty with. 

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Carmen

 

 

 

 

> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:06:29 -0400

> From: rdcar...@otnow.com

> To: OTlist@OTnow.com

> Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even
Possible?

> 

> Hello All:

> 

> A couple weeks ago, I worked with a CVA patient who despite having

> multiple occupational deficits, he was unwilling to verbalize any

> OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was d/c'd.

> 

> The patient's UE and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had almost no

> active movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely
painful

> during any AROM.

> 

> I initially told the patient that as an OT, I would address his most

> important occupations but that I could do nothing about his arm. Over

> the course of treatment, his wife reported having difficulty bathing

> under the patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded that

> there was a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic appointment

> was necessary. I conferred with the PT and she concurred. I also

> confirmed that the treating PTA would address the shoulder

> ROM/Pain.

> 

> Last Friday, I received a new referral for this same patient. When I

> questioned it, I was told that:

> 

> "...[PT saw the patient] and he has some issues so nursing

> went back in and she felt OT needed back in also so we received

> an order to do an eval and treat."

> 

> Based on this my ever so sweet scheduler made an appt with the
patient.

> At this point I had no idea why OT was called back in but suspected it

> was an arm "thing".

> 

> Just by coincidence, before my scheduled appointment, I ran into the

> treating PTA. When I asked her about the referral she confirmed that
the

> PT wanted OT to address the patient's arm. The PTA said that they

> thought a different OT than myself would be sent to the patient. And
if

> fact, I was later called by my homehealth office and "advised" that I

> didn't need to see the patient because it was an shoulder thing and
they

> understood that I don't do shoulders.

> 

> I've written countless paragraphs about breaking the 'band of UE

> therapy', but at this point, I'm thinking it may not even be possible.

> What is the message when one OT says "no" to focused shoulder
treatment

> while others cordially say "yes". Heck, at this point I'm confused!

> 

> Sadly yours,

> 

> Ron

> 

> ~~~

> Ron Carson MHS, OT

> www.OTnow.com

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> --

> Options?

> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

> 

> Archive?

> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

_________________________________________________________________

Windows Live? Hotmail?:?more than just e-mail.

http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_more_042009

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 9

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:28:49 -0400

From: cmnahrw...@aol.com

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it

      even Possible?

To: OTlist@OTnow.com

Message-ID: <8cb90f00f051c82-cd4...@webmail-dh47.sysops.aol.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed

 

Lets face the facts.  Most PTs do not know how to treat stroke shoulder 

dysfunction.  Most OTs do not know how to properly treat stroke 

shoulder dysfunction.  They think they can, but most of them do a 

botched up waste of time job.  It is a specialized skill, that warrents 

continued education.  It is beyond crazy busy for an OT with education 

in this area, because most clinicians in both the field of OT and PT do 

not feel comfortable with it and will gladly refer their patients to 

you.

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Carmen Aguirre <caguirr...@msn.com>

To: otlist@otnow.com

Sent: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 6:12 pm

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it 

even Possible?

 

 

I think treating the shoulder seemed to be warranted given the 

limitations it brough about to pt's and caregiver routines at home. It 

seemed to be related to safety, prevention of further limitation in his 

adl's or caregivers ability to care for him appropriately. Techniques 

applied such as bilateral integration, re-education during those adl 

tasks the caregiver seemed to be having difficulty with.

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Carmen

 

 

 

 

> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:06:29 -0400

> From: rdcar...@otnow.com

> To: OTlist@OTnow.com

> Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it 

even Possible?

> 

> Hello All:

> 

> A couple weeks ago, I worked with a CVA patient who despite having

=0

A> multiple occupational deficits, he was unwilling to verbalize any

> OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was d/c'd.

> 

> The patient's UE and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had almost no

> active movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely 

painful

> during any AROM.

> 

> I initially told the patient that as an OT, I would address his most

> important occupations but that I could do nothing about his arm. Over

> the course of treatment, his wife reported having difficulty bathing

> under the patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded that

> there was a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic appointment

> was necessary. I conferred with the PT and she concurred. I also

> confirmed that the treating PTA would address the shoulder

> ROM/Pain.

> 

> Last Friday, I received a new referral for this same patient. When I

> questioned it, I was told that:

> 

> "...[PT saw the patient] and he has some issues so nursing

> went back in and she felt OT needed back in also so we received

> an order to do an eval and treat."

> 

> Based on this my ever so sweet scheduler made an appt with the 

patient.

> At this point I had no idea why OT was called back in but suspected it

> was an arm "thing".

> 

> Just by coincidence, before my scheduled appointment, I ran into the

> treating PTA. When I asked her about the referral she confirmed that 

the

> 

PT wanted OT to address the patient's arm. The PTA said that they

> thought a different OT than myself would be sent to the patient. And 

if

> fact, I was later called by my homehealth office and "advised" that I

> didn't need to see the patient because it was an shoulder thing and 

they

> understood that I don't do shoulders.

> 

> I've written countless paragraphs about breaking the 'band of UE

> therapy', but at this point, I'm thinking it may not even be possible.

> What is the message when one OT says "no" to focused shoulder 

treatment

> while others cordially say "yes". Heck, at this point I'm confused!

> 

> Sadly yours,

> 

> Ron

> 

> ~~~

> Ron Carson MHS, OT

> www.OTnow.com

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> --

> Options?

> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

> 

> Archive?

> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

_________________________________________________________________

Windows Live? Hotmail?:?more than just e-mail.

http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_more_042009

--

Options?

www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

Archive?

www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

 

 

 

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 10

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:22:34 -0400

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT;   Is it

      even Possible?

To: Ron Carson <OTlist@OTnow.com>

Message-ID: <242249502.20090421202...@otnow.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 

Hello All:

 

I  thought  some more about this situation and I'm more comfortable with

my  decision  to  not treat this patient's shoulder. It is true that his

wife  said  she  was having difficulty bathing under the arm, and that's

why  I  initiated  contact with the PT. But, if I would have treated the

patient what is an appropriate goal?

 

Based on my treatment philosophy, ALL goals must be occupational. So, in

this  case,  my  goal  would  have been: "Pt will be able to bathe under

right  arm pit with assistance and no self-reported pain". To me, this
is

a great OT goal. But, when this goal is reached, which probably wouldn't

take  too  long, what would be the outcome of the patient's shoulder. He

may  have  gained 20 - 30 degrees of pain free passive ROM, allowing him

to bathe under his armpit, but by my goal, the OT would have stopped.

 

Is  that  really what is best for this patient? I don't think so. What I

think  he needs is SKILLED and focused treatment on his UE to reduce the

pain  and  increase  his  PROM. But, for me, this is NOT the role of OT,

it's the role of PT!

 

Thanks,

 

Ron

 

~~~

Ron Carson MHS, OT

www.OTnow.com

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Ron Carson <rdcar...@otnow.com>

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009

To:   Audra Ray <OTlist@OTnow.com>

Subj: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even
Possible?

 

RC> Thanks for writing.

 

RC> Maybe  this  is  one  of  the  cases  were  I was over zealous about
NOT

RC> treating someone's arm. But, I truly feel that PT is much better
trained

RC> and in my case, licensed, to treat bio-mechanical issues. It just
floors

RC> me that a PT would refer back to OT for shoulder treatment.

 

RC> Here's some things to consider:

 

RC> 1. Why do OT's treat arms and not legs?

 

RC> 2. Aren't MOST PT's better trained to treat physical dysfunction?

 

RC> 3.  Where  is  the  line  between focused treatment on an UE and
focused

RC> treatment   on   occupation?   Can   both   co-exist   with   the
same

RC> patient/therapist?

 

RC> This is a very confusing case for me!

 

RC> Ron

 

 

 

 

------------------------------

 

--

Unsubscribe?

  otlist-unsubscr...@otnow.com

 

Change options?

  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

 

Archive?

  www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

 

Help?

  h...@otnow.com

 

 

 

End of OTlist Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1

*************************************

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Reply via email to