I took some time off to work on Open Connector today considering what we've 
spoke about.

The connector source tree is now Microsoft Public License.  This is an OSI 
approved license and it helps us utilize example code.  I've made the change on 
the Sourceforge project, and will update all documentation as we move along.

The second make change is that I've started a new code branch for the merging 
of our old providers with the Microsoft supplied code.   The new providers will 
use the new Wrapped PST architecture.

As time permits I will work on...

1.       Merging all CalDAV functionality into the new providers.

2.       Merge installer and configuration GUIs into the new provider

3.       Creating that .Net bridge to allow more development to be done in C#

Anyone feeling like helping would be welcomed.

Best regards,
Kervin

From: g...@novadsp.com [mailto:g...@novadsp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:17 PM
To: Kervin Pierre
Cc: otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: development environment - RE: [otlkcon-devel] Status?

Hello all,

Further searching around the Unix/MAPI theme shows Evolution has covered a lot 
of ground.

See here for their project status: http://www.go-evolution.org/MAPIProvider

This matrix is interesting too: http://www.go-evolution.org/MAPIProvider/vsOWA

Jerry.


Kervin Pierre wrote:
This is very interesting.  I hadn't noticed that.

These providers have been around in one form or the other for  at least 10 
years now, first distributed with the MAPI Provider book.

We could never use them though because there was no explicit license attached 
to the source.

But with their inclusion on  Codeplex and explicit license we can now probably 
utilize those.  I'll look into this further.

Best regards,
Kervin


From: g...@novadsp.com<mailto:g...@novadsp.com> [mailto:g...@novadsp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:32 PM
To: Kervin Pierre
Cc: 
otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: development environment - RE: [otlkcon-devel] Status?

K, seen these? http://www.codeplex.com/OutlookMAPISamples

Kervin Pierre wrote:
You won't need Exchange, so that should help simplify the environment.  You 
won't need to inspect packets either.  You will need to inspect assembly.  Are 
you familiar with MAPI internals at all?  Or IDA Pro and Assembly Language?

I really only ever used a CalDAV server for testing.  We can use Bedework ( 
http://bedework.com/ ) for this.

If you plan on working on migrating the datalayer to C#, then you won't need a 
server at all.  All the testing can be done locally.

If you plan to work on shared folders support then you will need IDA Pro and 
lots, and lots of patience :)

Unfortunately, there isn't much documentation.  But I will be happy to answer 
any questions you may have.

 The role of the datalayer is to save MAPI data.  This is what saves 
appointments and messages to the disk.  It is only used by a very small number 
of interfaces.  Actually IMAPIProp 
(http://otlkcon.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/otlkcon/trunk/otlkcon/opncon/O_IProp.cpp?view=markup
 ) and IMAPITable being the biggest consumers.  Currently, it uses an SQLite 
database.  We should move this to SQL Server Compact for better locking, 
application transaction model and more support for platform database 
abstraction features.

Again, feel free to ask as many questions as you'd like.  I will try to clarify 
things as best as I can.

Best regards,
Kervin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
otlkcon-devel mailing list
otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/otlkcon-devel

Reply via email to