On 29.05.2011 08:03, WolfRage wrote: > Hi Kjell, > > First thank you for your work on python-otr. > > I have a few questions regarding your new otr implementation done using > pure python: 1. should this be used for furture otr implementations that > are written in Python? 2: how stable would you say this code is? 3: how > many testers have you gotten so far? > > I ask because I am working on creating a implementation for > Telepathy-Butterfly that will allow it to use OTR encryption. Since > this implementation is brand new, I don't think it would hurt to use > your experimental code, since it would work out the bugs in your code > and ensure my code will be up to date longer. Your thoughts? > Thank you again for your time. > -- > Jordan Farrell >
Hi Jordan, thanks for looking into this. To answer your questions: I'm using this package to build a stable OTR plugin for gajim. I think it should be generic enough to be used in other applications - if not, that's a bug. The code survived some manual testing against libotr code, as well as 1-2 weeks in "live action" (gajim plugin is working, release is on it's way in the next few weeks) - I found no bugs but I have to admit I don't have too many OTR contacts anymore. If you meant stability of the code base - I didn't put out an official release, because I wanted to be open for most kind of feedback. If noone points out major design flaws it will stay that way. Number of testers that I know of is about 2 - not counting you. :-) OTR in telepathy would be a really cool thing IMHO. Even more cool if it could be done independently for butterfly/gabble/... I've no idea about that framework though. HTH -- Kjell
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
