On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:20:26 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/22/11 3:03 PM, Sven Moritz Hallberg wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:12:36 +0200, Jonathan Schleifer > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There was a lot of code, but libotr just wants to be that > >> three-line drop in, so you lose a lot of flexibility which you need to > >> properly support XMPP with all it's features. > > > > out of curiosity, what are examples of those XMPP features? > > XMPP is used for many things other than sending human-readable IMs. > [...] > > Ideally, a future version of OTR would have a mode that enables people > to send this kind of information, instead of just XML character data > like the "foo" in <message><body>foo</body></message>.
this would necessarily be an XMPP-specific adaptation. there's nothing wrong with that, i think it would be a good idea to make one. but it's separate from the transport-agnostic "base case" currently catered to by libotr. i was wondering if there are XMPP specialities that actually interfere with implementing that text-IM-only base case? -pesco _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
