> -----Original Message----- > From: Howard Chu [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: March-08-12 5:58 AM > To: Rob Smits > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OTR-dev] pidgin-otr rewrite > > > OK, I'll doublecheck that. If you have a stacktrace handy that would give me a > head start.
I will send this to you separately. > > Did you patch pidgin with this? http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/14843 That > patch specifically was to address this problem. My mistake, I missed that patch. Good call. > > So I guess the conclusion here is that purple-otr should just exist on its own > as a fork of pidgin-otr, and will not be merged back in to the pidgin-otr code > base? It's clear that we can't preserve *everything* that the GTK UI can do, > and if people can't live without those bells and whistles, then there doesn't > seem to be any other choice. At this point I think a fork is the way to go. Usability does suffer a bit when you're stuck behind a couple levels of menus. But let me reiterate that it is absolutely awesome that purple-otr exists. Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
