Jurre van Bergen <[email protected]> writes: > OTR was never designed to be used as an encryption layer for digital > audio/video or HAM radio. It's designed to be an encryption layer for > instant messaging.
Agreed. > This will not be possible unless you modify great deals, and most > likely, you won't have much of the OTR properties. I don't understand why you think this. OTR has a sense of key exchange and management, and then a way to encrypt/mac each message in an series of (A->B B->A)* exchanges. How does the fact that a message might be bits (from a microphone, compressed through a codec) instead of a bunch of text really change the nature of what's going on?
pgpx1QgTnCE0Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
