-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/10/13 9:12 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >>>> <EionRobb> would it be more preferable to not have /me as a >>>> command and instead detect the /me in the send_im() func? >>>> <EionRobb> so that /help doesn't show "... me, me, ..." >>> >>> /commands on non-irc chats should not be processed by the irc >>> module. >> >> Does this apply to /me in other protocols, or only IRC? Ian >> seemed to imply that it was only IRC, but XMPP has support for >> /me too. > > I was not aware XMPP also suported /me. I'm also not sure what > that means for XMPP.
The usual emoting: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0245.html > All I want is that it does not leak plaintext :) Not that I know of! Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSL+FVAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pzPEQAKf5xJl4J2jTebZCc/9JvUgW /EUV11ff190si5DVzQDCI5H6Oq1D2vWZj98jcFyqcZhOh/tbXoz4pT8zbjHdou8t Me5OWqrrmHad/iSRGI557mNGxN0wcwX3hVuBhHCLKID65bowiAw/atBmioSxUmid AE3+xcj/ioPtIVgmedocF7KRbi96y06AdKyY/2Slqx1ay0N+AUN3wZ6uG0erIELa rGy3ZMypseAprPjRgs/zOJdiQAIufTR+J53YS13Izh6vQ05UTZjMNtXBxewzu5B6 42W9TROiLakX09+pGYVWfN43vNFCr1gWM/ZPBmafanF+M6RHHeTJKEByaE8Pw6vl +q1Wlqn1qTXRxFQEENSOp3S9T3ATRytI/Mz02G/QkvfRAynaoDJTQrLLcf1c+hPY mn2EFwaugzJKbwLM08s6Zo1kHrk4/JAdIF4u8EuKHfpdBjGhRthTdYmbg13USnCr UpsTs6Eh7ToLyAtzQX/U93fKnVbyoEkHhZDLZ4Vwxs0KlAhBkCoUE+/Rkfs5XHpb 5nbLjKyJg8KJlCUGAc8WiXvPjWWlVKQtTzD5ccgqXZDsd5GkIS565kktZCUo2w6W I6Dj6Q5bxSXW/4lT88EpTRw6Aw0u7FlorPS9LIdWYkEeP+Jv22zirwsEOkyNFbib EBX9Z0IT/foGDsqmC/F7 =areW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
