On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:46AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Greg Troxel wrote (15 Oct 2014 17:49:09 GMT) : > > That sounds fine, except that packaging systems will want to start with > > a release tarball and update the pkg and see if it is all ok, which then > > can lead to a respin. So I'd suggest putting up a 'make dist' draft > > output as early as is sane to let that process get going. > > A RC1 would be good too, but as far as I'm concerned, it's not > strictly needed, as long as there's time to > prepare/release/package/uploade a point-release to fix serious issues > identified in the initial release.
Fair enough. Here are the release candidate 1 tarballs: https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/libotr-4.1.0-rc1.tar.gz https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/pidgin-otr-4.0.1-rc1.tar.gz All packagers: please try these out and post here by the end of Monday (20 Oct) whether or not something is amiss. Paul in particular: the above tarballs still contain the 4.0.0 spec files. Please send me ones for the new versions if you want them included in the release. I will next try to build the Windows binaries. I've never tried that on this new machine, so hopefully the instructions in the repo haven't bitrotted too badly... :-p Thanks, all! - Ian _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
