Hi Chris, On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:57:43AM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote: > >It would be a technical nice feature. But in this case a IMAP box with > >1,5 GB isn't fine for the mail server. In my opinion. :) > > > >And a database/filesystem is faster then IMAP. > > If you've already got your messages in an IMAP store then it would make > a lot of sense to keep them there. I only want one copy of 1.5GB of > mail, thank you :-) > > The additional protocol overhead of an IMAP connection might be a concern, > but might be similar to a DB connection if the store and DB are co-located. > > Is writing new ArticleStorage classes documented anywhere? The existing > ArticleStorage classes don't seem to share a superclass or anything.
Sure, there are classes. Kernel/System/Ticket/ArticleStorageDB.pm and Kernel/System/Ticket/ArticleStorageFS.pm And Kernel::System::Ticket documentation is availabe at http://dev.otrs.org/. OTRS Dev documentation is availabe at http://doc.otrs.org/1.2/en/html/dev.html and http://doc.otrs.org/1.2/en/html/dev-custom-modules.html. > Chris Martin Edenhofer -- ((otrs.de)) :: OTRS GmbH :: Norsk-Data-Str. 1 :: 61352 Bad Homburg http://www.otrs.de/ :: Manage your communication! _______________________________________________ OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs Support oder Consulting für Ihr OTRS System? => http://www.otrs.de/
