The last paragraph about timing is wrong. I meant "No-setter" instead of
"Yes-setter" and "tickets that just got older than 2 days" instead of "new
tickets"


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Bogdan Iosif <bogdan.io...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Ugh... you're right. I don't know of any quick solution out of this
> situation. You could do something convoluted, like this:
> - Add a ticket dynamic field named "Changed in the last 2 days" of type
> multiple select with two values: "Yes" and "No"
> - Add a generic agent job "No-setter of Changed in the last 2 days" that
> uses the search condition "Change time" with "before 2 days" and sets
> "Changed in the last 2 days" to "No"
> - Add another generic agent job "Yes-setter of Changed in the last 2 days"
> that uses the search condition "Change time" with "last 2 days" and sets
> "Changed in the last 2 days" to "Yes"
> - Add a report that filters tickets based on "Changed in the last 2 days"
> = "No"
>
> You will need to adjust timings for the jobs based on when you need to run
> the report because unless the "Yes-setter" runs very often you will not
> catch new tickets in the report as they don't have the dynamic field set to
> "Yes" until "Yes-setter" runs
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Darshak Modi <darshak.m...@elitecore.com
> > wrote:
>
>>  As per my understanding,In report creation/generation there is no
>> selection of Article update before/after like criteria, which is
>> available in search.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18-04-2013 PM 02:36, Bogdan Iosif wrote:
>>
>> You seem to have understood Steven's "search" suggestion as a suggestion
>> for something else than a report. I think what he meant by "search" is the
>> filtering condition for a report. And you seem to already know that reports
>> can be executed from the command line.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Darshak Modi <
>> darshak.m...@elitecore.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Thanks a lot.
>>>
>>> Ok .. not so handy for me atleast! but will try.
>>>
>>> As suggested by Steven , if searching article update solves, i tested,
>>> can we run the search using command line?
>>> Just like reports , can the searches be run using some pl file?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18-04-2013 PM 01:35, Bogdan Iosif wrote:
>>>
>>>   I don't think you can do this with dynamic stats (the type of report
>>> where you configure fields for columns, filters, etc. from OTRS's agent web
>>> interface -> STATISTICS module).
>>>
>>>  You can do it with static stats if you know some minimal Perl, SQL and
>>> how to integrate a new Perl file into OTRS as a backend for a static stat
>>> report. If you know SQL but not Perl then you can forget about integrating
>>> the report into OTRS and just run a query on the OTRS database and export
>>> its results in Excel.
>>>
>>> For the query you need to select from table "ticket" those entries not
>>> having corresponding entries in table "ticket_history" with their
>>> "create_time" column within the last 2 days and their "history_type_id"
>>> column = "2" (2 corresponds to a "FollowUp" history entry type).
>>>
>>>  OTRS registers a history entry of type "FollowUp" whenever a customer
>>> posts a reply to a ticket through his web interface or via email. You need
>>> to decide your definition of "follow up" is the same. You will also need to
>>> add to the query references to a lot of simple dictionary type tables to
>>> get actual human readable values for things like ticket's queue name,
>>> service name, owner, etc. This last part can be covered by just looking at
>>> the database tables and making common sense assumptions.
>>>
>>>  /bogdan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Darshak Modi <
>>> darshak.m...@elitecore.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  How to find that the ticket does not have any follow up in last 2
>>>> days, when its open.
>>>> In search or report creation there is no option for followup search,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
>>>> Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
>>>> To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
>>> Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
>>> To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
>>> Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
>>> To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
>> Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
>> To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
>> Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
>> To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs

Reply via email to