Send Outages-discussion mailing list submissions to
        outages-discussion@outages.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        outages-discussion-requ...@outages.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        outages-discussion-ow...@outages.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Outages-discussion digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [outages] [External] Re: 4.2.2.2 down in LA area (Calvin E.)
   2. Re: [outages] [External] Re: 4.2.2.2 down in LA area
      (Patrick W. Gilmore)
   3. Re: [outages] [External] Re: 4.2.2.2 down in LA area
      (Charles Sprickman)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:45:07 -0800
From: "Calvin E." <calv...@gmail.com>
To: outages-discussion@outages.org
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] [outages] [External] Re: 4.2.2.2
        down in LA area
Message-ID:
        <CAC_jndotdXENJbfE7ptK=wa0adxeknuiylq1xfmkcyu3gyr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Out of curiosity regarding non-Lumen customers using 4.2.2.2, why not use
the intentionally public DNS like Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 and Google
8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 10:30 Hunter Fuller via Outages <outa...@outages.org>
wrote:

> Additionally, configuring one DNS server is a bad idea. I?m not sure if
> 4.2.2.2 is anycasted, but 4.2.2.1 through 4.2.2.6 exist and all work, so if
> you are a Lumen customer and want to use their resolvers, it?d be prudent
> to configure any two of those.
>
> In other words, I mean this as gently as possible, but one of six
> redundant servers going offline is not what I?d call an ?outage.?
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 08:34 Mike Bolitho via Outages <outa...@outages.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Speaking as a former Level 3 employee from way back. 4.2.2.2 is NOT a
>> polling server. So if you're using it for that, you should stop. Second,
>> while it is publicly available for DNS, it is first and foremost a server
>> for Level 3 customers. What they do with it and how available it is outside
>> the network is not guaranteed. YMMV.
>>
>> - Mike Bolitho
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 3:03 AM Michael B. Williams via Outages <
>> outa...@outages.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Team - I have been seeing issues as well since approximately 19
>>> December 2022.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Outages mailing list
>>> outa...@outages.org
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Outages mailing list
>> outa...@outages.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>>
> --
>
> --
> Hunter Fuller (they)
> Router Jockey
> VBH M-1C
> +1 256 824 5331
>
> Office of Information Technology
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
> Network Engineering
> _______________________________________________
> Outages mailing list
> outa...@outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20230308/7080d843/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:49:29 -0500
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patr...@ianai.net>
To: outages-discussion@outages.org
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] [outages] [External] Re: 4.2.2.2
        down in LA area
Message-ID: <5bb25242-f8bc-4470-98b5-1a379ab83...@ianai.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Quad-9!!

9.9.9.9

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

> On Mar 8, 2023, at 15:45, Calvin E. via Outages-discussion 
> <outages-discussion@outages.org> wrote:
> 
> Out of curiosity regarding non-Lumen customers using 4.2.2.2, why not use the 
> intentionally public DNS like Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 and Google 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 
> <http://8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4>?
> 
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 10:30 Hunter Fuller via Outages <outa...@outages.org 
> <mailto:outa...@outages.org>> wrote:
>> Additionally, configuring one DNS server is a bad idea. I?m not sure if 
>> 4.2.2.2 is anycasted, but 4.2.2.1 through 4.2.2.6 exist and all work, so if 
>> you are a Lumen customer and want to use their resolvers, it?d be prudent to 
>> configure any two of those. 
>> 
>> In other words, I mean this as gently as possible, but one of six redundant 
>> servers going offline is not what I?d call an ?outage.?
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 08:34 Mike Bolitho via Outages <outa...@outages.org 
>> <mailto:outa...@outages.org>> wrote:
>>> Speaking as a former Level 3 employee from way back. 4.2.2.2 is NOT a 
>>> polling server. So if you're using it for that, you should stop. Second, 
>>> while it is publicly available for DNS, it is first and foremost a server 
>>> for Level 3 customers. What they do with it and how available it is outside 
>>> the network is not guaranteed. YMMV.
>>> 
>>> - Mike Bolitho
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 3:03 AM Michael B. Williams via Outages 
>>> <outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Team - I have been seeing issues as well since approximately 19 
>>>> December 2022.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Outages mailing list
>>>> outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Outages mailing list
>>> outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>> -- 
>> 
>> --
>> Hunter Fuller (they)
>> Router Jockey
>> VBH M-1C
>> +1 256 824 5331
>> 
>> Office of Information Technology
>> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
>> Network Engineering
>> _______________________________________________
>> Outages mailing list
>> outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion@outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20230308/0cda0ee9/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 16:58:12 -0500
From: Charles Sprickman <sp...@bway.net>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patr...@ianai.net>
Cc: outages-discussion@outages.org
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] [outages] [External] Re: 4.2.2.2
        down in LA area
Message-ID: <d9db323e-1807-4b9d-94f8-e86cb96a3...@bway.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

>From Verizon in the northeast you have to go all the way to Miami to hit them. 
>I don't think they've quite built out something like the other public DNS 
>resolvers yet... too much latency here from the northeast, and it's not like 
>AS701 is a little "niche" provider.

traceroute to 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  [AS701] lo0-100.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-312.verizon-gni.net (108.53.194.1)  1.461 ms  
4.016 ms  4.026 ms
 2  [AS701] 100.41.27.126 (100.41.27.126)  5.765 ms
    [AS701] 100.41.27.128 (100.41.27.128)  2.792 ms  3.252 ms
 3  [AS0] 0.csi1.NWRKNJ02-MSE01-BB-SU1.ALTER.NET (140.222.4.104)  3.830 ms  
5.810 ms
    [AS0] 0.csi1.NBWKNJNB-MSE01-BB-SU1.ALTER.NET (140.222.4.106)  5.787 ms
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * [AS1299] nyk-b2-link.ip.twelve99.net (80.239.192.36)  3.698 ms *
 7  [AS1299] nyk-bb2-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.135.162)  3.419 ms  3.371 ms
    [AS1299] nyk-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.135.160)  3.976 ms
 8  [AS1299] rest-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.141.244)  10.893 ms  13.279 
ms
    [AS1299] ash-bb2-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.136.201)  10.275 ms
 9  [AS1299] mai-b2-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.120.177)  62.750 ms
    [AS1299] mai-b2-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.119.231)  35.217 ms  32.628 ms
10  [AS1299] mai-b1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.125.7)  30.985 ms  30.413 ms  
31.972 ms
11  [AS1299] packet23725-svc067139-ic350558.ip.twelve99-cust.net 
(62.115.182.165)  32.467 ms  30.541 ms  32.401 ms
12  [AS19281] dns9.quad9.net (9.9.9.9)  32.920 ms !Z  35.039 ms !Z  34.747 ms !Z

> On Mar 8, 2023, at 3:49 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore via Outages-discussion 
> <outages-discussion@outages.org> wrote:
> 
> Quad-9!!
> 
> 9.9.9.9
> 
> -- 
> TTFN,
> patrick
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2023, at 15:45, Calvin E. via Outages-discussion 
>> <outages-discussion@outages.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Out of curiosity regarding non-Lumen customers using 4.2.2.2, why not use 
>> the intentionally public DNS like Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 and Google 
>> 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 <http://8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4>?
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 10:30 Hunter Fuller via Outages <outa...@outages.org 
>> <mailto:outa...@outages.org>> wrote:
>>> Additionally, configuring one DNS server is a bad idea. I?m not sure if 
>>> 4.2.2.2 is anycasted, but 4.2.2.1 through 4.2.2.6 exist and all work, so if 
>>> you are a Lumen customer and want to use their resolvers, it?d be prudent 
>>> to configure any two of those. 
>>> 
>>> In other words, I mean this as gently as possible, but one of six redundant 
>>> servers going offline is not what I?d call an ?outage.?
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 08:34 Mike Bolitho via Outages <outa...@outages.org 
>>> <mailto:outa...@outages.org>> wrote:
>>>> Speaking as a former Level 3 employee from way back. 4.2.2.2 is NOT a 
>>>> polling server. So if you're using it for that, you should stop. Second, 
>>>> while it is publicly available for DNS, it is first and foremost a server 
>>>> for Level 3 customers. What they do with it and how available it is 
>>>> outside the network is not guaranteed. YMMV.
>>>> 
>>>> - Mike Bolitho
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 3:03 AM Michael B. Williams via Outages 
>>>> <outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Team - I have been seeing issues as well since approximately 19 
>>>>> December 2022.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Outages mailing list
>>>>> outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Outages mailing list
>>>> outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Hunter Fuller (they)
>>> Router Jockey
>>> VBH M-1C
>>> +1 256 824 5331
>>> 
>>> Office of Information Technology
>>> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
>>> Network Engineering
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Outages mailing list
>>> outa...@outages.org <mailto:outa...@outages.org>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
>> _______________________________________________
>> Outages-discussion mailing list
>> Outages-discussion@outages.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion@outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20230308/e1cd0abd/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion


------------------------------

End of Outages-discussion Digest, Vol 153, Issue 3
**************************************************

Reply via email to