Send Outages-discussion mailing list submissions to
outages-discussion@outages.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
outages-discussion-requ...@outages.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
outages-discussion-ow...@outages.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Outages-discussion digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Spectrum/Charter IPv6 connectivity to CloudFlare down in
Texas (Mark Milhollan)
2. Re: NTT - High Latency between Dallas and LA exchanges
(Scott Wrosch)
3. Re: NTT - High Latency between Dallas and LA exchanges
(Ross Tajvar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 11:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Milhollan <mlm+outages-li...@milhollan.com>
To: outages-discussion@outages.org
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] Spectrum/Charter IPv6 connectivity
to CloudFlare down in Texas
Message-ID: <n5680023-on28-sr7q-q352-59n07orq0...@zvyubyyna.pbz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023, Carl Perry wrote:
>I don't believe this is a CloudFlare issue, it's very much a Spectrum/Charter
>issue.
The problem I had getting to the Dallas area via Spectrum IPv6 a few
weeks ago was resolved. It might be worth a few moments to double-check
your native IPv6 service.
/mark
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 23:02:35 +0000
From: Scott Wrosch <sco...@rbogeek.com>
To: Outages Discussion <outages-discussion@outages.org>
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] NTT - High Latency between Dallas
and LA exchanges
Message-ID:
<bl1pr22mb358889d2ae71eca4c3b08f5bce...@bl1pr22mb3588.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I?ve definitely been seeing issues in game, coming from the Detroit area.
tracert 204.2.29.90
Tracing route to 204.2.29.90 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms
2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.254
3 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 23-117-52-1.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net
[23.117.52.1]
4 2 ms 5 ms 60 ms 71.151.213.64
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms 12.83.32.129
7 13 ms 15 ms 15 ms cgcil402igs.ip.att.net [12.122.133.161]
8 51 ms 56 ms 60 ms 192.205.32.194
9 59 ms 58 ms 61 ms ae-4.r23.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
[129.250.4.239]
10 56 ms 56 ms 55 ms ae-1.r24.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
[129.250.5.17]
11 116 ms 110 ms 111 ms ae-4.a00.scrmca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
[129.250.7.57]
12 111 ms * 111 ms xe-0-0-5-0.a00.scrmca03.us.ce.gin.ntt.net
[128.241.2.18]
13 * * * Request timed out.
14 110 ms * 110 ms 204.2.29.90
Trace complete.
From: Outages-discussion <outages-discussion-boun...@outages.org> On Behalf Of
Ross Tajvar via Outages-discussion
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 1:44 PM
To: Cody Wilson <c...@codywilson.co>
Cc: Outages Discussion <outages-discussion@outages.org>
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] NTT - High Latency between Dallas and LA
exchanges
This is a pretty vague problem report. Are the source/dest on-net with NTT or
are one or both sides behind another carrier? What time(s) is this an issue -
all the time or just certain times of day?
On Wed, May 17, 2023, 12:58 PM Cody Wilson via Outages-discussion
<outages-discussion@outages.org<mailto:outages-discussion@outages.org>> wrote:
Hey folks -
For the past 3 days or so, there seems to be some high latency between the
Dallas and LA exchanges of NTT. Specifically, it seems to be the hop between
ae-1.r20.dllstx14.us.bb.gin.ntt.net<http://ae-1.r20.dllstx14.us.bb.gin.ntt.net>
and
ae-2.r24.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net<http://ae-2.r24.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net>,
where there's observed latency increases of about 60-70 ms. This was raised to
my attention through the Final Fantasy XIV community, where East Coast and
Central US players are experiencing high jitter. Curious if this is affecting
anyone else's traffic.
_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org<mailto:Outages-discussion@outages.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20230517/e9b10ef6/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 19:07:29 -0400
From: Ross Tajvar <r...@tajvar.io>
To: Scott Wrosch <sco...@rbogeek.com>
Cc: Outages Discussion <outages-discussion@outages.org>
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] NTT - High Latency between Dallas
and LA exchanges
Message-ID:
<CA+FDdDRT7UoEu=tk98adeqvjyqsvhanrdys_o9xvyp805kh...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
This is congestion between NTT and AT&T, not an NTT internal issue. I've
run into this as well and NTT has let me know that AT&T is refusing to
upgrade their peering ports in places where there is congestion. I doubt
that contacting AT&T will be fruitful in persuading them to change their
mind, so my recommendation is to use another carrier to reach AT&T
customers.
On Wed, May 17, 2023, 7:03 PM Scott Wrosch via Outages-discussion <
outages-discussion@outages.org> wrote:
> I?ve definitely been seeing issues in game, coming from the Detroit area.
>
>
>
>
>
> tracert 204.2.29.90
>
>
>
> Tracing route to 204.2.29.90 over a maximum of 30 hops
>
>
>
> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms
>
> 2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.254
>
> 3 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms
> 23-117-52-1.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [23.117.52.1]
>
> 4 2 ms 5 ms 60 ms 71.151.213.64
>
> 5 * * * Request timed out.
>
> 6 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms 12.83.32.129
>
> 7 13 ms 15 ms 15 ms cgcil402igs.ip.att.net [12.122.133.161]
>
> 8 51 ms 56 ms 60 ms 192.205.32.194
>
> 9 59 ms 58 ms 61 ms ae-4.r23.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
> [129.250.4.239]
>
> 10 56 ms 56 ms 55 ms ae-1.r24.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
> [129.250.5.17]
>
> 11 116 ms 110 ms 111 ms ae-4.a00.scrmca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
> [129.250.7.57]
>
> 12 111 ms * 111 ms xe-0-0-5-0.a00.scrmca03.us.ce.gin.ntt.net
> [128.241.2.18]
>
> 13 * * * Request timed out.
>
> 14 110 ms * 110 ms 204.2.29.90
>
>
>
> Trace complete.
>
>
>
> *From:* Outages-discussion <outages-discussion-boun...@outages.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Ross Tajvar via Outages-discussion
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2023 1:44 PM
> *To:* Cody Wilson <c...@codywilson.co>
> *Cc:* Outages Discussion <outages-discussion@outages.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Outages-discussion] NTT - High Latency between Dallas and
> LA exchanges
>
>
>
> This is a pretty vague problem report. Are the source/dest on-net with NTT
> or are one or both sides behind another carrier? What time(s) is this an
> issue - all the time or just certain times of day?
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023, 12:58 PM Cody Wilson via Outages-discussion <
> outages-discussion@outages.org> wrote:
>
> Hey folks -
>
> For the past 3 days or so, there seems to be some high latency between the
> Dallas and LA exchanges of NTT. Specifically, it seems to be the hop
> between ae-1.r20.dllstx14.us.bb.gin.ntt.net and
> ae-2.r24.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net, where there's observed latency
> increases of about 60-70 ms. This was raised to my attention through the
> Final Fantasy XIV community, where East Coast and Central US players are
> experiencing high jitter. Curious if this is affecting anyone else's
> traffic.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion@outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion@outages.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20230517/00c54798/attachment.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
------------------------------
End of Outages-discussion Digest, Vol 155, Issue 2
**************************************************
