On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:45:05 -0500 Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Although I'm not Flavio, I do have some quick thoughts on this. > > Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> writes: > > > My main concern with this was that it implements a new python-ovs package > > and leaves the existing one alone. I'd like to figure out how to change > > the existing package so that we always use this approach. > > +1. I don't think this should be split out the way it is here. The preference is for a sub-package and if it's something that most people don't care but gets impacted, then we can use a conditional to enable the build. Creating another package causes headaches for all distros maintainers because one has import in the distro and deal with two packages from now on. -- Flavio _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev