Hi Ben, Many thanks for the reply.. Will send out another version after the end of freeze
Regards _Sugesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 5:06 PM > To: Chandran, Sugesh <sugesh.chand...@intel.com> > Cc: 'd...@openvswitch.org' <d...@openvswitch.org>; 'ro...@mellanox.com' > <ro...@mellanox.com>; 'ktray...@redhat.com' <ktray...@redhat.com>; > 'fla...@flaviof.com' <fla...@flaviof.com> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH] Pipeline packet processing in OVS using > FVL flow director. > > No, I haven't looked at this further. Probably, you should post a new version > after the end of the freeze, to get more attention. > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:16:44AM +0000, Chandran, Sugesh wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > Did you get chance to look at this patch? Any comments or suggestion on > this? > > > > > > Regards > > _Sugesh > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chandran, Sugesh > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 9:51 AM > > > To: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > > Cc: d...@openvswitch.org; ro...@mellanox.com; ktray...@redhat.com; > > > fla...@flaviof.com > > > Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH] Pipeline packet processing in OVS > > > using FVL flow director. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > _Sugesh > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] > > > > Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 7:44 PM > > > > To: Chandran, Sugesh <sugesh.chand...@intel.com> > > > > Cc: d...@openvswitch.org; ro...@mellanox.com; > ktray...@redhat.com; > > > > fla...@flaviof.com > > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH] Pipeline packet processing in > > > > OVS using FVL flow director. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:23:55PM +0000, Sugesh Chandran wrote: > > > > > The RFC patch that uses the metadata information from the NIC to > > > > avoid/reduce the > > > > > packet processing overhead in OVS. > > > > > It uses the flow director feature in XL710 NICs to identify and > > > > > report the VxLAN tunneled packets. OVS-DPDK uses the reported > > > > > information to > > > > bypass the > > > > > VxLAN tunnel processing in software. > > > > > > > > This is interesting and I'd like to apply it locally to look at it > > > > more closely. What commit is it based on? It doesn't seem to > > > > apply cleanly > > > to current master. > > > [Sugesh] Ben, Thank you for looking at the patch. I haven't merged > > > the patch on the latest master yet. > > > Can you please try on following commit on the master? > > > > > > commit 01961bbdd34a9d0be03315401319ef0851a21364 > > > Author: Daniele Di Proietto <diproiet...@vmware.com> > > > Date: Tue Oct 4 17:58:05 2016 -0700 > > > > > > dpdk: New module with some code from netdev-dpdk. > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
