On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:08:54PM +0500, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote: > Recently, I was evaluating a multi-threaded OVSDB/ovn-northd design, and > came across the patchset [1]. > > Looks like this RFC patchset was received well, but never completed. What's > the reason? No real performance benefits, lack of interest, other > high-priority tasks or whatever?
It's kind of a combination of those. Andy got preempted by other higher-priority work, plus it's unclear whether threading ovsdb-server solves an important problem at this time. I'm currently working on adding clustering support to OVSDB, which ought to allow scaling out reads, which are most of the OVN workload, so that might solve the same problem in a different way. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
