On 4/10/17, 7:10 AM, "Stephen Finucane" <step...@that.guru> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 15:28 +0000, Darrell Ball wrote: > > On 4/7/17, 6:58 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of > Stephen Finucane" <ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of steph > e...@that.guru> wrote: > > I wanted to find the mappings of DPDK versions to OVS versions. > This was > a little more difficult than expected. Resolve the issue by > linking to > it from the DPDK install guide. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <step...@that.guru> > --- > Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > index b947bd5..f29ac05 100644 > --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ This document describes how to build and > install Open vSwitch using a DPDK > datapath. Open vSwitch can use the DPDK library to operate > entirely in > userspace. > > +.. seealso:: > + > + The :doc:`releases FAQ </faq/releases>` lists support for > the required > + versions of DPDK for each version of Open vSwitch. > + > > If it is not intuitive to follow the path > Open vswitch Documentation -> FAQ -> Releases, > then perhaps it means > “Releases” should also be linked at the same level as Installation > Guides, Tutorials etc > Releases is really one of first high topics people are interested in. That would apply if you're navigating the docs from '/' and I see merit in doing that. I'll reroll a v2 shortly. However, this wouldn't help users navigating to the page from Google (like I was) and I think we should keep this change itself. Having both is what I was getting at; that is what I meant by “also”. Thanks > > Build requirements > ------------------ > > -- > 2.9.3 > Stephen _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev