Please disregard this patch - incorrect subject line.

I'll submit the updated version promptly.

Thanks,
Mark

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] 
>On Behalf Of
>Mark Kavanagh
>Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 10:59 AM
>To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; qiud...@chinac.com
>Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/1] netdev-dpdk: multi-segment mbuf jumbo frame 
>support
>
>This RFC introduces an approach for implementing jumbo frame support for
>OvS-DPDK with multi-segment mbufs.
>
>== Overview ==
>Currently, jumbo frame support for OvS-DPDK is implemented by increasing
>the size of mbufs within a mempool, such that each mbuf within the pool is
>large enough to contain an entire jumbo frame of a user-defined size.
>Typically, for each user-defined MTU 'requested_mtu', a new mempool is created,
>containing mbufs of size ~requested_mtu.
>
>With the multi-segment approach, all ports share the same mempool, in which
>each mbuf is of standard/default size (~2k MB). To accommodate jumbo frames,
>mbufs may be chained together, each mbuf storing a portion of the jumbo frame;
>each mbuf in the chain is termed a segment, hence the name.
>
>
>== Enabling multi-segment mbufs ==
>Multi-segment and single-segment mbufs are mutually exclusive, and the user
>must decide on which approach to adopt on init. The introduction of a new
>optional OVSDB field, 'dpdk-multi-seg-mbufs', facilitates this; this is a
>boolean field, which defaults to false. Setting the field is identical to
>setting existing DPDPK-specific OVSDB fields:
>
>    sudo $OVS_DIR/utilities/ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch . 
> other_config:dpdk-
>init=true
>    sudo $OVS_DIR/utilities/ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch . 
> other_config:dpdk-lcore-
>mask=0x10
>    sudo $OVS_DIR/utilities/ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch . 
> other_config:dpdk-socket-
>mem=4096,0
>==> sudo $OVS_DIR/utilities/ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch . 
>other_config:dpdk-multi-
>seg-mbufs=true
>
>
>== Code base ==
>This patch is dependent on the multi-segment mbuf patch submitted by Michael
>Qiu (currently V2): 
>https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-May/331792.html.
>The upstream base commit against which this patch was generated is 1e96502;
>to test this patch, check out that branch, apply Michael's patchset, and then
>apply this patch:
>
>    3.  netdev-dpdk: enable multi-segment jumbo frames
>    2.  DPDK multi-segment mbuf support (Michael Qiu)
>    1.  1e96502 tests: Only run python SSL test if SSL support is configur... 
> (OvS upstream)
>
>The DPDK version used during testing is v17.02, although v16.11 should work
>equally well.
>
>
>== Testing ==
>As this is an RFC, only a subset of the total traffic paths/vSwitch
>configurations/actions have been tested - a summary of traffic paths tested
>thus far is included below. The action tested in all cases is OUTPUT. Tests
>in which issues were observed are summarized beneath the table.
>
>+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>|  Traffic Path                                                                
>       |
>+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>| DPDK Phy 0   -> OvS -> DPDK Phy 1                                            
>       |
>| DPDK Phy 0   -> OvS -> Kernel Phy 0                                          
>   [1] |
>| Kernel Phy 0 -> OvS -> DPDK Phy 0                                            
>       |
>|                                                                              
>       |
>| DPDK Phy 0   -> OvS -> vHost User 0 -> vHost User 1 -> OvS -> DPDK Phy 1 *   
>       |
>| DPDK Phy 0   -> OvS -> vHost User 0 -> vHost User 1 -> OvS -> Kernel Phy 0 * 
>   [1] |
>| Kernel Phy 0 -> OvS -> vHost User 1 -> vHost User 0 -> OvS -> -> DPDK Phy 0 
>*   [2] |
>|                                                                              
>       |
>| vHost0       -> OvS -> vHost1                                                
>       |
>+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>  * = guest kernel IP forwarding
>[1] = incorrect L4 checksum
>[2] = traffic not forwarded in guest kernel. This behaviour is also observed 
>on OvS master.
>
>_______________________________________________
>dev mailing list
>d...@openvswitch.org
>https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to