> 2017-02-21 6:49 GMT-08:00 Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>:
> > Reconfiguration of HW NICs may lead to packet drops.
> > In current model all physical ports will be reconfigured each time 
> > number of PMD threads changed. Since we not stopping threads on 
> > pmd-cpu-mask changes, this patch will help to further decrease 
> > port's downtime by setting the maximum possible number of wanted tx 
> > queues to avoid unnecessary reconfigurations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>
> 
> I haven't thought this through a lot, but the last big series we 
> pushed on master went exactly in the opposite direction, i.e. created 
> one txq for each thread in the datapath.
> 
> I thought this was a good idea because:
> 
> * On some systems with hyperthreading we can have a lot of cpus (we 
> received
>    reports of systems with 72 cores). If you want to use only a couple 
> of cores
>    you're still forced to have a lot of unused txqs, which prevent you 
> from having
>    lockless tx.
> * We thought that reconfiguring the number of pmds would not be a frequent
>    operation.
> 
> Why do you want to reconfigure the threads that often?  Is it to be 
> able to support more throughput quickly?  In this case I think we 
> shouldn't use the number of cpus, but something else coming from the 
> user, so that the administrator can balance how quickly pmd threads 
> can be reconfigured vs how many txqs should be on the system.
> I'm not sure how to make this user friendly though.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniele

Hi Ilya,

I would agree with Danieiles comments. There were issues in the past that when 
the number of txqs was set to the number of CPUs and hyperthreading was enabled 
the NIC HW would not support that many tx queues which led to trouble with DPDK 
device txq initialization.

Are the packet drops when changing PMD mask still an issue for you?

It's been a while since this feedback was given, I'd be interested if you 
intend to submit further work on this.

Ian

> 
> > ---
> >  lib/dpif-netdev.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c index
> > 6e575ab..e2b4f39 100644
> > --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> > @@ -3324,7 +3324,11 @@ reconfigure_datapath(struct dp_netdev *dp)
> >       * on the system and the user configuration. */
> >      reconfigure_pmd_threads(dp);
> >
> > -    wanted_txqs = cmap_count(&dp->poll_threads);
> > +    /* We need 1 Tx queue for each possible cpu core. */
> > +    wanted_txqs = ovs_numa_get_n_cores();
> > +    ovs_assert(wanted_txqs != OVS_CORE_UNSPEC);
> > +    /* And 1 Tx queue for non-PMD threads. */
> > +    wanted_txqs++;
> >
> >      /* The number of pmd threads might have changed, or a port can 
> > be
> new:
> >       * adjust the txqs. */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to