Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> writes:

> Flavio Leitner <f...@sysclose.org> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 11:09:57AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> According to the packaging guidelines found at
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts:Python3EPEL, when
>>> specifying a python3 package, use the %{python3_pkgversion} macro to get
>>> the appropriate suffix.
>>
>> This looks incomplete because the package's name remains python3-openvswitch
>> where it should have been python%{python3_pkgversion}-openvswitch.
>> Same issue with the requires for that subpackage.
>
> Makes sense.  I'll fix it up, and test.
>
> Thanks Flavio!
>

With a clean Fedora system, I don't see the error that I was getting
that led me to change this.

Additionally, some asking around has led me to understand
that those guidelines are for EPEL packages (openvswitch is not an EPEL
package).  And it seems like they may not even be current.

I'm going to drop this patch from my submission.  Sorry for the noise.

-Aaron
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to