On 1/19/26 7:13 PM, David Yang wrote:
> In ovs_vport_get_upcall_stats(), some statistics protected by
> u64_stats_sync, are read and accumulated in ignorance of possible
> u64_stats_fetch_retry() events. These statistics are already accumulated
> by u64_stats_inc(). Fix this by reading them into temporary variables
> first.
> 
> Fixes: 1933ea365aa7 ("net: openvswitch: Add support to count upcall packets")
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  net/openvswitch/vport.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Hi, David.  The change makes sense to me, thanks!

> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport.c b/net/openvswitch/vport.c
> index 6bbbc16ab778..bc46d661b527 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/vport.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/vport.c
> @@ -319,13 +319,17 @@ int ovs_vport_get_upcall_stats(struct vport *vport, 
> struct sk_buff *skb)
>       for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>               const struct vport_upcall_stats_percpu *stats;
>               unsigned int start;
> +             __u64 n_success;
> +             __u64 n_fail;

In addition to Eric's suggestion on using plain u64, you may also
put these two together on the same line, right above the definition
for 'start', to keep the reverse x-mass tree ordering.

>  
>               stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->upcall_stats, i);
>               do {
>                       start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp);
> -                     tx_success += u64_stats_read(&stats->n_success);
> -                     tx_fail += u64_stats_read(&stats->n_fail);
> +                     n_success = u64_stats_read(&stats->n_success);
> +                     n_fail = u64_stats_read(&stats->n_fail);
>               } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start));
> +             tx_success += n_success;
> +             tx_fail += n_fail;
>       }
>  
>       nla = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, OVS_VPORT_ATTR_UPCALL_STATS);

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to