On 18 Feb 2026, at 22:37, Mike Pattrick via dev wrote:

> Currently there is no rate limit on tunnel hardware address ARP/ND
> lookups. Furthermote, there is no indication for how frequently action
> translation composes these packets.
>
> This patch implements a limit of generating one packet per destination
> per second and adds a counter for each time a lookup happens.
>
> Fixes: a36de779d739 ("openvswitch: Userspace tunneling.")
> Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-2986
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Allow the user to adjust the holdout timer
>  - Corrected atomic barrier types
>  - Display incomplete entries in tnl/neigh/show
> ---

Thanks, Mike, for sending out v2 of the patch. I’ve looked at it and have some 
comments below:

//Eelco

>  NEWS                               |   3 +
>  lib/tnl-neigh-cache.c              | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  lib/tnl-neigh-cache.h              |   2 +-
>  ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate-cache.c |   2 +-
>  ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c       |  12 +-
>  tests/tunnel-push-pop-ipv6.at      |  25 ++++-
>  tests/tunnel-push-pop.at           |  51 +++++++--
>  7 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index d5642f985..a33b7bce0 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>  Post-v3.7.0
>  --------------------
> +   - Userspace datapath:
> +     * ARP/ND lookups for native tunnel are now rate limited. The holdout
> +       timer can be configured with 'ovs/neigh/holdout'.

Should we try to align this with the kernel? ovs/neigh/retrans_time

>  v3.7.0 - 16 Feb 2026
> diff --git a/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.c b/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.c
> index bdff1debc..7c545cb51 100644
> --- a/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.c
> +++ b/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.c
> @@ -45,8 +45,9 @@
>  #include "openvswitch/vlog.h"
>
>
> -#define NEIGH_ENTRY_DEFAULT_IDLE_TIME_MS  (15 * 60 * 1000)
> -#define NEIGH_ENTRY_MAX_AGING_TIME_S  3600
> +#define NEIGH_ENTRY_DEFAULT_IDLE_TIME_MS    (15 * 60 * 1000)

I guess one space after _MS should be enough.

> +#define NEIGH_ENTRY_MAX_AGING_TIME_S        3600
> +#define NEIGH_ENTRY_LOOKUP_HOLDOUT_MS       1000
>
>  struct tnl_neigh_entry {
>      struct cmap_node cmap_node;
> @@ -54,11 +55,13 @@ struct tnl_neigh_entry {
>      struct eth_addr mac;
>      atomic_llong expires;       /* Expiration time in ms. */
>      char br_name[IFNAMSIZ];
> +    atomic_bool complete;
>  };
>
>  static struct cmap table = CMAP_INITIALIZER;
>  static struct ovs_mutex mutex = OVS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>  static atomic_uint32_t neigh_aging;
> +static atomic_uint32_t neigh_holdout;
>
>  static uint32_t
>  tnl_neigh_hash(const struct in6_addr *ip)
> @@ -85,6 +88,25 @@ tnl_neigh_get_aging(void)
>      return aging;
>  }
>
> +static uint32_t
> +tnl_neigh_get_holdout(void)
> +{
> +    unsigned int holdout;
> +
> +    atomic_read_explicit(&neigh_holdout, &holdout, memory_order_acquire);
> +    return holdout;
> +}
> +
> +static bool
> +tnl_neigh_is_complete(struct tnl_neigh_entry *neigh)
> +{
> +    bool complete;
> +
> +    atomic_read_explicit(&neigh->complete, &complete, memory_order_acquire);
> +

Remove the extra new line here, as you do not have in the previous function
> +    return complete;
> +}
> +
>  static struct tnl_neigh_entry *
>  tnl_neigh_lookup__(const char br_name[IFNAMSIZ], const struct in6_addr *dst)
>  {
> @@ -98,27 +120,62 @@ tnl_neigh_lookup__(const char br_name[IFNAMSIZ], const 
> struct in6_addr *dst)
>                  return NULL;
>              }
>
> -            atomic_store_explicit(&neigh->expires, time_msec() +
> -                                  tnl_neigh_get_aging(),
> -                                  memory_order_release);
> +            if (tnl_neigh_is_complete(neigh)) {
> +                atomic_store_explicit(&neigh->expires,
> +                                      time_msec() + tnl_neigh_get_aging(),
> +                                      memory_order_release);
> +            }
> +
>              return neigh;
>          }
>      }
>      return NULL;
>  }
>
> +static void
> +tnl_neigh_set_partial(const char name[IFNAMSIZ], const struct in6_addr *dst)
> +{
> +    ovs_mutex_lock(&mutex);
> +    struct tnl_neigh_entry *neigh = tnl_neigh_lookup__(name, dst);
> +    if (neigh) {
> +        /* Entry inserted before lock taken. */
> +
> +        ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +    neigh = xmalloc(sizeof *neigh);
> +
> +    neigh->ip = *dst;
> +    atomic_store_relaxed(&neigh->complete, false);
> +    atomic_store_relaxed(&neigh->expires,
> +                         time_msec() + tnl_neigh_get_holdout());
> +    ovs_strlcpy(neigh->br_name, name, sizeof neigh->br_name);
> +    cmap_insert(&table, &neigh->cmap_node, tnl_neigh_hash(&neigh->ip));
> +
> +    ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> +    seq_change(tnl_conf_seq);
> +}
> +
>  int
>  tnl_neigh_lookup(const char br_name[IFNAMSIZ], const struct in6_addr *dst,
> -                 struct eth_addr *mac)
> +                 struct eth_addr *mac, bool allow_changes)
>  {
>      struct tnl_neigh_entry *neigh;
>      int res = ENOENT;
>
>      neigh = tnl_neigh_lookup__(br_name, dst);
>      if (neigh) {
> -        *mac = neigh->mac;
> -        res = 0;
> +        if (tnl_neigh_is_complete(neigh)) {
> +            *mac = neigh->mac;
> +            res = 0;
> +        } else {
> +            res = EINPROGRESS;
> +        }
> +    } else if (allow_changes && tnl_neigh_get_holdout()) {
> +        /* Insert a partial entry only if there is a holdout timer set. */
> +        tnl_neigh_set_partial(br_name, dst);
>      }
> +
>      return res;
>  }
>
> @@ -142,26 +199,40 @@ tnl_neigh_set(const char name[IFNAMSIZ], const struct 
> in6_addr *dst,
>  {
>      ovs_mutex_lock(&mutex);
>      struct tnl_neigh_entry *neigh = tnl_neigh_lookup__(name, dst);
> +    bool insert = true;
> +
>      if (neigh) {
> -        if (eth_addr_equals(neigh->mac, mac)) {
> -            atomic_store_relaxed(&neigh->expires, time_msec() +
> -                                 tnl_neigh_get_aging());
> +        if (!tnl_neigh_is_complete(neigh)) {
> +            insert = false;
> +        } else if (eth_addr_equals(neigh->mac, mac)) {
> +            atomic_store_relaxed(&neigh->expires,
> +                                 time_msec() + tnl_neigh_get_aging());
>              ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
>              return;
> +        } else {
> +            tnl_neigh_delete(neigh);
>          }
> -        tnl_neigh_delete(neigh);
>      }
> -    seq_change(tnl_conf_seq);
>
> -    neigh = xmalloc(sizeof *neigh);
> +    if (insert) {
> +        neigh = xmalloc(sizeof *neigh);
> +
> +        neigh->ip = *dst;
> +        ovs_strlcpy(neigh->br_name, name, sizeof neigh->br_name);
> +    }
>
> -    neigh->ip = *dst;
>      neigh->mac = mac;
> -    atomic_store_relaxed(&neigh->expires, time_msec() +
> -                         tnl_neigh_get_aging());
> -    ovs_strlcpy(neigh->br_name, name, sizeof neigh->br_name);
> -    cmap_insert(&table, &neigh->cmap_node, tnl_neigh_hash(&neigh->ip));
> +    atomic_store_explicit(&neigh->expires,
> +                          time_msec() + tnl_neigh_get_aging(),
> +                          memory_order_release);
> +    atomic_store_explicit(&neigh->complete, true, memory_order_release);
> +
> +    if (insert) {
> +        cmap_insert(&table, &neigh->cmap_node, tnl_neigh_hash(&neigh->ip));
> +    }
> +
>      ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> +    seq_change(tnl_conf_seq);
>  }
>
>  static void
> @@ -317,6 +388,12 @@ tnl_neigh_cache_aging(struct unixctl_conn *conn, int 
> argc,
>      atomic_store_explicit(&neigh_aging, aging, memory_order_release);
>      new_exp = time_msec() + aging;
>
> +    if (aging < tnl_neigh_get_holdout()) {
> +        /* It isn't logical to for the holdout timer to be longer than the

Guess the 'logical to for' needs 'to' to be removed.

> +         * aging timer. */
> +        atomic_store_relaxed(&neigh_holdout, aging);

Should we really try to update a configuration here? Should it be done as part 
of the configuration check only?
Do the check in tnl_neigh_cache_aging()? On top of this, should it be:

  atomic_store_explicit(&neigh_holdout, aging, memory_order_release);


> +    }
> +
>      CMAP_FOR_EACH (neigh, cmap_node, &table) {
>          atomic_read_explicit(&neigh->expires, &curr_exp,
>                               memory_order_acquire);
> @@ -329,6 +406,48 @@ tnl_neigh_cache_aging(struct unixctl_conn *conn, int 
> argc,
>      unixctl_command_reply(conn, "OK");
>  }
>
> +static void
> +tnl_neigh_cache_holdout(struct unixctl_conn *conn, int argc,
> +                        const char *argv[], void *aux OVS_UNUSED)
> +{
> +    long long int new_exp, curr_exp;
> +    struct tnl_neigh_entry *neigh;
> +    uint32_t holdout;
> +
> +    if (argc == 1) {
> +        struct ds ds = DS_EMPTY_INITIALIZER;
> +        ds_put_format(&ds, "%"PRIu32, tnl_neigh_get_holdout());
> +        unixctl_command_reply(conn, ds_cstr(&ds));
> +        ds_destroy(&ds);
> +
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Zero holdout value is acceptable. */
> +    if (!ovs_scan(argv[1], "%"SCNu32, &holdout) ||
> +        holdout > tnl_neigh_get_aging()) {
> +        unixctl_command_reply_error(conn, "bad holdout value");
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    atomic_store_explicit(&neigh_holdout, holdout, memory_order_release);
> +    new_exp = time_msec() + holdout;
> +
> +    CMAP_FOR_EACH (neigh, cmap_node, &table) {
> +        if (tnl_neigh_is_complete(neigh)) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +        atomic_read_explicit(&neigh->expires, &curr_exp,
> +                             memory_order_acquire);
> +        if (new_exp < curr_exp) {
> +            atomic_store_explicit(&neigh->expires, new_exp,
> +                                  memory_order_release);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    unixctl_command_reply(conn, "OK");
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  lookup_any(const char *host_name, struct in6_addr *address)
>  {
> @@ -387,8 +506,13 @@ tnl_neigh_cache_show(struct unixctl_conn *conn, int argc 
> OVS_UNUSED,
>          need_ws = INET6_ADDRSTRLEN - (ds.length - start_len);
>          ds_put_char_multiple(&ds, ' ', need_ws);
>
> -        ds_put_format(&ds, ETH_ADDR_FMT"   %s",
> -                      ETH_ADDR_ARGS(neigh->mac), neigh->br_name);
> +        if (tnl_neigh_is_complete(neigh)) {
> +            ds_put_format(&ds, ETH_ADDR_FMT"   %s",
> +                          ETH_ADDR_ARGS(neigh->mac), neigh->br_name);
> +        } else {
> +            ds_put_format(&ds, "00:00:00:00:00:00   %s INCOMPLETE",

My preference is to show no MAC address at all, as technically all zeros is a 
valid MAC.

> +                          neigh->br_name);
> +        }
>          if (tnl_neigh_expired(neigh)) {
>              ds_put_format(&ds, " STALE");
>          }
> @@ -404,6 +528,7 @@ void
>  tnl_neigh_cache_init(void)
>  {
>      atomic_init(&neigh_aging, NEIGH_ENTRY_DEFAULT_IDLE_TIME_MS);
> +    atomic_init(&neigh_holdout, NEIGH_ENTRY_LOOKUP_HOLDOUT_MS);
>      unixctl_command_register("tnl/arp/show", "", 0, 0,
>                               tnl_neigh_cache_show, NULL);
>      unixctl_command_register("tnl/arp/set", "BRIDGE IP MAC", 3, 3,
> @@ -420,4 +545,6 @@ tnl_neigh_cache_init(void)
>                               tnl_neigh_cache_flush, NULL);
>      unixctl_command_register("tnl/neigh/aging", "[SECS]", 0, 1,
>                               tnl_neigh_cache_aging, NULL);
> +    unixctl_command_register("tnl/neigh/holdout", "[MILLISECS]", 0, 1,

Other commands use msecs, so maybe we should use it here too? I'm fine either 
way.

> +                             tnl_neigh_cache_holdout, NULL);
>  }
> diff --git a/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.h b/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.h
> index 877bca312..2aaa2168b 100644
> --- a/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.h
> +++ b/lib/tnl-neigh-cache.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ int tnl_neigh_snoop(const struct flow *flow, struct 
> flow_wildcards *wc,
>  void tnl_neigh_set(const char name[IFNAMSIZ], const struct in6_addr *dst,
>                     const struct eth_addr mac);
>  int tnl_neigh_lookup(const char dev_name[IFNAMSIZ], const struct in6_addr 
> *dst,
> -                     struct eth_addr *mac);
> +                     struct eth_addr *mac, bool allow_changes);

allow_changes still does not make it clear what this flag does. Even when set 
to false, it updates the timestamp. Maybe it should be allow_add_partial?

>  void tnl_neigh_cache_init(void);
>  void tnl_neigh_cache_run(void);
>  void tnl_neigh_flush(const char dev_name[IFNAMSIZ]);
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate-cache.c 
> b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate-cache.c
> index c6d935cf0..16cf812c9 100644
> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate-cache.c
> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate-cache.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ xlate_push_stats_entry(struct xc_entry *entry,
>      case XC_TNL_NEIGH:
>          /* Lookup neighbor to avoid timeout. */
>          tnl_neigh_lookup(entry->tnl_neigh_cache.br_name,
> -                         &entry->tnl_neigh_cache.d_ipv6, &dmac);
> +                         &entry->tnl_neigh_cache.d_ipv6, &dmac, false);
>          break;
>      case XC_TUNNEL_HEADER:
>          if (entry->tunnel_hdr.operation == ADD) {
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> index de82e2903..0b38dcf55 100644
> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
>  COVERAGE_DEFINE(xlate_actions);
>  COVERAGE_DEFINE(xlate_actions_oversize);
>  COVERAGE_DEFINE(xlate_actions_too_many_output);
> +COVERAGE_DEFINE(xlate_actions_neigh_sent);
>
>  VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(ofproto_dpif_xlate);
>
> @@ -3931,17 +3932,26 @@ native_tunnel_output(struct xlate_ctx *ctx, const 
> struct xport *xport,
>          s_ip = in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&s_ip6);
>      }
>
> -    err = tnl_neigh_lookup(out_dev->xbridge->name, &d_ip6, &dmac);
> +    err = tnl_neigh_lookup(out_dev->xbridge->name, &d_ip6, &dmac, true);
>      if (err) {
>          struct in6_addr nh_s_ip6 = in6addr_any;
>
>          put_cloned_drop_action(ctx->xbridge->ofproto, ctx->odp_actions,
>                                 XLATE_TUNNEL_NEIGH_CACHE_MISS,
>                                 !is_last_action);
> +        if (err == EINPROGRESS) {
> +            xlate_report(ctx, OFT_DETAIL,
> +                         "neighbor cache miss for %s on bridge %s, "
> +                         "waiting on %s request",
> +                         buf_dip6, out_dev->xbridge->name,
> +                         d_ip ? "ARP" : "ND");
> +            return err;
> +        }
>          xlate_report(ctx, OFT_DETAIL,
>                       "neighbor cache miss for %s on bridge %s, "
>                       "sending %s request",
>                       buf_dip6, out_dev->xbridge->name, d_ip ? "ARP" : "ND");
> +        COVERAGE_INC(xlate_actions_neigh_sent);
>
>          err = ovs_router_get_netdev_source_address(
>              &d_ip6, netdev_get_name(out_dev->netdev), &nh_s_ip6);
> diff --git a/tests/tunnel-push-pop-ipv6.at b/tests/tunnel-push-pop-ipv6.at
> index b11387345..2c885e1b5 100644
> --- a/tests/tunnel-push-pop-ipv6.at
> +++ b/tests/tunnel-push-pop-ipv6.at
> @@ -344,7 +344,20 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 action=normal])
>  dnl Check Neighbour discovery.
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl -- set Interface p0 options:pcap=p0.pcap])
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive int-br 
> 'in_port(2),eth(src=aa:55:aa:55:00:00,dst=f8:bc:12:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=1.1.3.92,dst=1.1.3.88,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),icmp(type=0,code=0)'])
> +dnl First trace should send only two ND lookups, for each destination IP

Comments should end with a dot.

> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace ovs-dummy "in_port(int-br),]dnl
> +  [eth(src=aa:55:aa:55:00:00,dst=f8:bc:12:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),]dnl
> +  [ipv4(src=1.1.3.92,dst=1.1.3.88,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),]dnl
> +  [icmp(type=0,code=0)"], [0], [stdout])
> +AT_CHECK([grep -q "sending ND request" stdout], [0])
> +
> +dnl Second trace should not send any ND lookups

Comments should end with a dot.

> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace ovs-dummy "in_port(int-br),]dnl
> +  [eth(src=aa:55:aa:55:00:00,dst=f8:bc:12:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),]dnl
> +  [ipv4(src=1.1.3.92,dst=1.1.3.88,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),]dnl
> +  [icmp(type=0,code=0)"], [0], [stdout])
> +AT_CHECK([grep -q "waiting on ND request" stdout], [0])
> +AT_CHECK([grep -qv "sending ND request" stdout], [0])
>
>  dnl Wait for the two Neighbor Solicitation packets to be sent.
>  dnl Sometimes the system can be slow (e.g. under valgrind)
> @@ -373,6 +386,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/set br0 2001:cafe::92 
> aa:bb:cc:00:00:01], [0], [O
>
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br0 | sort], [0], [dnl
>  2001:cafe::92                                 aa:bb:cc:00:00:01   br0
> +2001:cafe::93                                 00:00:00:00:00:00   br0 
> INCOMPLETE
>  ])
>
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 5000
> @@ -438,7 +452,8 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p1 
> 'in_port(200),eth(src=f8:bc:12:44:3
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br | sort], [0], [dnl
> +dnl Previous receive causes a flood that results in a lookup of 1.1.2.93.
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92 | sort], [0], [dnl

Wondering why we need this change? Is there more going on now?

>  2001:cafe::92                                 f8:bc:12:44:34:b6   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -577,8 +592,10 @@ 
> icmp,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=be:b6:f4:e1:49:4a,dl_dst=fe:71:d8:83:72:4f,nw_src=30
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl dump-ports int-br | grep 'port  5'], [0], [dnl
>    port  5: rx pkts=1, bytes=98, drop=?, errs=?, frame=?, over=?, crc=?
>  ])
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows int-br | grep 'in_port(6081)'], [0], 
> [dnl
> -recirc_id(0),tunnel(tun_id=0x7b,ipv6_src=2001:cafe::92,ipv6_dst=2001:cafe::88,geneve({class=0xffff,type=0x80,len=4,0xa/0xf}{class=0xffff,type=0,len=4}),flags(+key)),in_port(6081),packet_type(ns=0,id=0),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no),
>  packets:0, bytes:0, used:never, 
> actions:userspace(pid=0,controller(reason=1,dont_send=0,continuation=0,recirc_id=3,rule_cookie=0,controller_id=0,max_len=65535))
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows int-br | grep 'in_port(6081)' | 
> strip_recirc], [0], [dnl
> +[recirc_id(<recirc>),tunnel(tun_id=0x7b,ipv6_src=2001:cafe::92,ipv6_dst=2001:cafe::88,geneve({class=0xffff,type=0x80,len=4,0xa/0xf}{class=0xffff,type=0,len=4}),flags(+key)),]dnl
> +[in_port(6081),packet_type(ns=0,id=0),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no), 
> packets:0, bytes:0, used:never, ]dnl
> +[actions:userspace(pid=0,controller(reason=1,dont_send=0,continuation=0,recirc_id=<recirc>,rule_cookie=0,controller_id=0,max_len=65535))]
>  ])
>
>  dnl Receive VXLAN with different MAC and verify that the neigh cache gets 
> updated
> diff --git a/tests/tunnel-push-pop.at b/tests/tunnel-push-pop.at
> index f22a37570..4cd0970e6 100644
> --- a/tests/tunnel-push-pop.at
> +++ b/tests/tunnel-push-pop.at
> @@ -256,7 +256,26 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl revalidator/wait])
>  dnl Check ARP request
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl -- set Interface p0 options:pcap=p0.pcap])
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive int-br 
> 'in_port(2),eth(src=aa:55:aa:55:00:00,dst=f8:bc:12:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=1.1.3.92,dst=1.1.3.88,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),icmp(type=0,code=0)'])
> +dnl First trace should send only two ARP lookups, for each destination IP

Comments should end with a dot.

> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace ovs-dummy "in_port(int-br),]dnl
> +  [eth(src=aa:55:aa:55:00:00,dst=f8:bc:12:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),]dnl
> +  [ipv4(src=1.1.3.92,dst=1.1.3.88,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),]dnl
> +  [icmp(type=0,code=0)"], [0], [stdout])
> +AT_CHECK([grep -q "sending ARP request" stdout], [0])
> +
> +dnl Check partial entry installed.
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/arp/show | grep INCOMPLETE | sort], [0], [dnl
> +1.1.2.92                                      00:00:00:00:00:00   br0 
> INCOMPLETE
> +1.1.2.93                                      00:00:00:00:00:00   br0 
> INCOMPLETE
> +])
> +
> +dnl Second trace should not send any ARP lookups

Comments should end with a dot.

> +AT_CHECK([[ovs-appctl ofproto/trace ovs-dummy "in_port(int-br),]dnl
> +  [eth(src=aa:55:aa:55:00:00,dst=f8:bc:12:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),]dnl
> +  [ipv4(src=1.1.3.92,dst=1.1.3.88,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),]dnl
> +  [icmp(type=0,code=0)"]], [0], [stdout])
> +AT_CHECK([grep -q "waiting on ARP request" stdout], [0])
> +AT_CHECK([grep -qv "sending ARP request" stdout], [0])
>
>  dnl Wait for the two ARP requests to be sent. Sometimes the system
>  dnl can be slow (e.g. under valgrind)
> @@ -277,6 +296,9 @@ bad aging value
>  ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
>  ])
>
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/holdout 0], [0], [OK
> +])
> +
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/aging 3601], [2], [], [dnl
>  bad aging value
>  ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
> @@ -285,9 +307,18 @@ ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/aging 1], [0], [OK
>  ])
>
> +dnl Holdout must be smaller than aging.
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/holdout 2000], [2], [], [dnl
> +bad holdout value
> +ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
> +])
> +
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/aging 3600], [0], [OK
>  ])
>
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/holdout 6000], [0], [OK
> +])
> +
>  dnl Set the aging time to 5 seconds
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/aging 5], [0], [OK
>  ])
> @@ -296,6 +327,10 @@ dnl Read the current aging time
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/aging], [0], [5
>  ])
>
> +dnl Reducing aging below holdout will also set holdout.
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/holdout], [0], [5000
> +])
> +
>  dnl Add an entry
>  AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/set br0 1.1.2.92 aa:bb:cc:00:00:01], [0], [OK
>  ])
> @@ -324,7 +359,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p0 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(1),eth(src=f8
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br0 | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:c8   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -334,7 +369,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p0 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(1),eth(src=f8
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br0 | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:c8   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -345,7 +380,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p0 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(1),eth(src=f8
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br0 | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:c8   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -355,7 +390,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p0 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(1),eth(src=f8
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br0 | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:b6   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -366,7 +401,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p1 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(200),eth(src=
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:b6   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -376,7 +411,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p0 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(1),eth(src=f8
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:c8   br0
>  ])
>
> @@ -386,7 +421,7 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive p0 
> 'recirc_id(0),in_port(1),eth(src=f8
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>  ovs-appctl time/warp 1000
>
> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep br | sort], [0], [dnl
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl tnl/neigh/show | grep 92], [0], [dnl
>  1.1.2.92                                      f8:bc:12:44:34:b2   br0
>  ])
>
> -- 
> 2.53.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to